I don’t think I’m smart enough to figure out the root cause of this healthcare dysfunction. I went to the dentist this morning and the office manager said “Aetna still hasn’t paid for your last visit”. This was five months ago.
On my way out, I asked her about the payment, if there was a problem, etc. She elaborated, “No, a person at Aetna told me that half of the submitted claims go on a shelf and half of those get lost.”
Again, this is all second and third hand. Why would an Aetna rep admit such a thing, assuming it is true? They could very well be disgruntled because they think their employer is screwing over dentists by intentionally delaying payment.
So we have a health insurance company — it’s their job to pay a doctor or dentist for services rendered. Aetna is inflating their profits by purposefully delaying payment to doctors? How much waste is added to the system as the office managers have to call and call and resubmit payment?
“Just think of the money they make on interest from holding our money longer,” the office manager added with a sigh.
This practice hurts the dentist’s cash flow…. not that he seems to be hurting in general. They’re making money (not off me) from services like teeth-whitening that are paid out of pocket.
If Aetna paid everything promptly, they would see their profits and cashflow hurt, which means they would probably try to jack up the premiums paid by my employer on my behalf (or my co-pay would get raised, probably both).
So who has incentive to fix the situation, to make sure my dentist gets paid promptly? My employer doesn’t. Aetna sure doesn’t. The dentist office loses by refusing to accept Aetna coverage (and the other “payers” probably do as badly). I don’t have enough power, as the covered party, to influence change, do I?
Maybe I should raise this question with my employer’s HR staff. As a healthcare company and as a company that practices and teaches lean principles, I would hope that they wouldn’t stand for this.
As I quoted a doctor earlier this week, “Respect for patient time is a business model.” Some people are succeeding by doing things the right way. Why is that some companies seem to base their business model on hurting others? That’s not lean. That’s not right. Who can fix it? Who wants to fix it?
In a lean system, the insurance payer would process claims 100% accurately and within a consistent and reasonable timeframe, say 60 days. That’s a typical payment timeline when a manufacturer pays a vendor, unless you’re trying to squeeze your suppliers by stretching out terms to 90 days or longer. Not lean.
42 states have responded with “prompt payment” laws, as you can read here. The “payers” argue that doctors offices “upcode” claims (cheating the system to get paid for more than they did) and repeatedly submit multiple claims in order to get paid faster (can you blame them?). Either way, it’s a mess. I guess you have to get government to step in if the parties involved can’t get along.
Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please scroll down to post a comment. Click here to receive posts via email. Learn more about Mark Graban’s speaking, writing, and consulting.