10 Things I Wish Lean Practitioners Wouldn’t Say in 2010

by Mark Graban on January 4, 2010 · 36 comments

In the blog tradition of “Top X” lists (and “do not say” lists, like this one from Time or this workplace list from CNN), I’m going to take a stab at a list of things that I hope Lean practitioners will avoid saying in 2010. With apologies to David Letterman…

1. “Let’s lean out that department.”

This phrase has long been the bane of a Lean Thinker’s existence. To “lean out” a place implies a few incorrect notions.

First, it implies that Lean is a process that you can complete. It sounds like a cliché at this point, but Lean is a journey, not a destination. Nobody ever has a waste-free process and Lean is an ongoing management philosophy, not a project to complete.

Secondly, the phrase implies that we can go “do Lean” for somebody. External forces, like a consultant (or, sigh, “sensei”) can play a role, such as teaching or coaching. To be most effective, the team members and leaders in that area must embrace and own the transition to Lean Thinking. It can’t be done “to” them or “for” them, it must be done “with” them.

I’d accept “lean is a journey” as a nominee phrase to consider avoiding, but I’ll probably keep seeing that one.

2. “We need to redeploy bodies.”

Redeploying people (or assigning them to another department or a new job) is definitely the preferred alternative to using Lean improvements to drive layoffs. “No layoffs due to Lean” policies are smart and admirable.

What I don’t like is the use of “bodies” or “heads” to describe our most valuable asset, our people. At least calling people “heads” implies that you expect them to think. But still, I think we can just call people “people.” Even seasoned Lean leaders,

3. “We need to hire a ‘sensei.’”

It’s better than saying “we need to hire some heads to help Lean out that department.” Let’s just call a consultant a consultant. Or, better yet, a “coach” or “advisor.” Sensei furthers this whole mystique about Lean, that Lean is complicated and foreign, when it’s really quite simple and should be accessible to all, not just senseis or “belts.”

Sensei is a Japanese word that doesn’t always have positive connotations. Quoting Wikipedia (sorry to be doing that):

“Sometimes enthusiastic supporters and admirers use it fawningly, as when addressing or talking about charismatic business, political, and spiritual leaders. Japanese speakers are particularly sensitive to this usage when it concerns members of an in-group who spontaneously associate or identify sensei with a particular person—many if not most Japanese speakers readily see this usage as indicative of adherents speaking of a charismatic spiritual or cult leader. When talking about such situations, Japanese speakers will sometimes use the term sarcastically to ridicule overblown adulation…”

Yes, I realize Jim Womack used the phrase “lean sensei” in “Lean Thinking .” I think it’s OK to question that at this point in our Lean progression. I mean no offense to the people who use this term, but I think it’s a bit overdone in the Lean world. Do organizations benefit from having a consultant, a coach, or advisor? Yes, absolutely. I, for one, will never hang the term “sensei” on myself. I had the job title of “Lean Expert” once, and that was bad enough.

4. “Our goal is to do XX kaizen events this year.”

That’s completely the wrong goal, the number of events. If this is pushed as the primary goal, it’s possible that you’ll get a certain number of easy events that don’t deliver much value. This is, at best, a secondary goal – with the primary goal being improvements in safety, quality, time, cost, and morale. Or better yet, the primary goal can be learning, as it is at Toyota, per David Meier.

5. “Lean says we should ____________ …”

Or, a variation in the form of a question, “What would Lean say about __________?

Lean is not a person, it is a set of principles. It shouldn’t even become a number of set-in-stone principles that are a replacement for thinking.  We can learn from Lean principles, but we shouldn’t blindly copy or implement a Lean principle without thinking. I worked for one company in the 90’s that had gotten really excited about the supposed Lean principle of “Zero Inventories” (thanks, probably, due to book of the same title ). They cheerfully got rid of their finished goods inventory, only to find that their production lead times were too long and too highly variable for that to ever work. Blindly following a rule really hurt them and their customers.

“What would Lean say about our batch size?” Probably that it could be smaller than it is now, but we don’t know that as an off-hand answer. Rather than falling back on a role principle or a rule of thumb, it’s better to think through situations yourself or follow a number of Plan-Do-Check-Act cycles (or PDCA). There’s a reason some Toyota leaders call TPS the “Thinking Production System.”

6. How do I get my ___________s to buy in?

This expression is often used with: managers, front-line employees, physicians, executives, nurses, etc. Far too often, “How do I get my employees to buy in?” is hidden code for “How do I get my people to fall in line and do what I say?”

If we are expecting people to “buy” in, I’d argue that, as leaders, we must be “selling” Lean or other concepts. Lack of buy in means, at least, that people are engaged and thinking. If they have a reservation about Lean or a new process, take that concern seriously. It might not just be idle complaining.

I’m sure in my previous example, there was an employee or materials manager who thought “zero inventories” was a terrible idea. Was their concern viewed as “lack of buy in” to be mocked or ignored?

7. “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.”

I don’t believe that statement. I think this phrase should be avoided and it certainly shouldn’t be attributed to Dr. W. Edwards Deming, as it often is mistakenly. Dr. Deming never said this and he, in fact, meant quite the opposite. Some of the most important factors in a system are very difficult, even impossible, to measure. That doesn’t mean you can’t try to manage them. John Hunter, friend and fellow blogger, has the definitive take definitive blog take on this here. Update: Bob Emiliani’s definitive academic article (referenced in his comment to this post) is here: WGMGM.pdf.

8, 9, and 10: “Let’s hansei about our yokoten over by the kamishibai board.”

I’m not opposed to all things or words of Japanese origin. Far from it. But I think the Lean movement has gotten a bit carried away in embracing Japanese words. Some of the most recent to enter the lexicon:

Hansei = reflection

Yokoten = horizontal spread of an idea in an organization, or “spread”

Kamishibai board = well, let’s let our friend and fellow blogger Jon Miller describe it. I have seen a kamishibai board in use, yes. It’s a great concept, just a mouthful to say.

Some Lean Japanese words are, as we say in Texas, “a cow that is already out of the barn.” I guess this means its too late to quit saying words like “kaizen” and “kanban” (although I’ve never understood why it’s so hard to get the cow back in the proverbial barn).

How do we get the cow to “buy in” and get back into the barn? The stupid cow “hates change,” I guess. Well, except for the change of leaving the barn to begin with. That’s another nominee phrase to avoid, “people hate change,” as I had written about here.

I try to write simply and directly. If we are working in an English-speaking environment, I think we should say:

“Let’s reflect about how to spread Lean over by the visual management board.”

I’m about ready to start making up Japanese terms. We need a term for “sustainment,” as much as we talk about the concept.

I think I heard somewhere that its called “Jasunbai.” Coincidentally, it’s pronounced just like the name of the Boston Red Sox New York Mets’ left fielder, Jason Bay. Makes it easy to remember and say, don’t you think? ;-) There’s a new term to DEFINITELY avoid in 2010.

What do you think? Am I wrong? Are there phrases and terms that I shouldn’t be so afraid of?? Are there terms you would put on your personal “stop saying” list to complement your “stop doing” list?

http://www.gembapantarei.com/2006/11/what_is_a_kamishibai.html
  • Share/Bookmark

Other Posts That Might Add Value:

{ 6 trackbacks }

thekua.com@work » You can’t measure everything effectively
January 6, 2010 at 6:12 am
Danilo Sato » Blog Archive » GQM: Metrics come last
January 6, 2010 at 7:50 am
Hospital Looking for a “Sensi”?? — Lean Blog
January 10, 2010 at 10:45 am
Deming 101 :: learnsigma
February 10, 2010 at 3:12 am
“No Problems is Problem” – Video — Lean Blog
May 15, 2010 at 8:01 am
Where’s the Love in Lean Six? | Welcome to Big Sky Associates
May 21, 2010 at 7:14 pm

{ 30 comments… read them below or add one }

1 jamie flinchbaugh January 4, 2010 at 7:44 am

Good list. As I read the titled to the post, the first thing that came to mind was “lean out.” Too bad that’s prevalent enough that it made the top of your list too.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

2 Mark Welch January 4, 2010 at 8:52 am

Good stuff. I would hope that many consulting practices out there that regularly use these phrases/words would seriously pause and reflect on them… Unfortunately, the Japanese words are slick and too many people who are new to lean are blinded by the razzle dazzle. I for one avoid them practically altogether anymore. I barely even use “gemba.” Now it’s “workplace.”

For me, personally, though, I don’t want to get too self-conscious in the connotation of my words/phrases. But, this post has inspired me to be more conscious of them. I’ll likely do a little check for understanding more frequently when I’m working with people to be sure my words are being perceived as intended.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

3 Bob Emiliani January 4, 2010 at 9:00 am

Regarding #7, the related phrase “what gets measured gets managed” bothered me enough when I worked in industry to later write a paper that was published in 2000 titled “The false promise of ‘what gets measured gets managed”’ (Management Decision, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2000, pp. 612-615). In it, I used mathematical logic to disprove this statement. Everyone believes in this phrase, yet it is so easy to disprove both empirically (if one simply observes) and using formal logic. The phrase is really bad because it encourages a proliferation of unnecessary metrics and causes people to lose focus. Often, Lean transformations muddle along because of too many metrics and the fact that the metrics are an awful (and confusing) mix of new Lean and legacy batch-and-queue metrics. And of course that which is not easily measured or cannot be shown on a spreadsheet is typically ignored, even though the information may be extremely important for management decision-making. One of the things we have to do better is teach Lean people to do is to comprehend and utilize non-quantitative information, because their legacy is to focus almost exclusively on quantitative data.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

4 Pete Abilla January 4, 2010 at 10:06 am

@Bob – with proliferation of metrics, they also become “unmanageable proliferation of metrics” because there are too many, requiring time and people to pull the data; it’s a slippery slope from here: leadership loses focus, rank-and-file loses focus and question their place, role, and value they add to the organization, often new software packages are required to satisfy the data-metrics monster, costing more money and time for implementation, etc.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

5 Mark Welch January 4, 2010 at 11:12 am

I think it was Bill Waddell over at Evolving Excellence a few weeks ago that quoted Einstein. “Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.”

Very succinctly put.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

6 Liz Guthridge January 4, 2010 at 3:47 pm

Terrific advice, with one caveat below! I hope this Top 10 list sticks!

Regarding #6, I respectfully disagree that lean leaders should be selling. Instead, leaders should be influencing, that is motivating people to work together, decide that the articulated goals and plans are worthwhile, and then take steps to fulfill them. For a helpful distinction between influence and persuasion (which totally avoids using the awful phrase “buy in”), check out: http://nicoledefalco.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/influence-vs-persuasion-a-critical-distinction-for-leaders/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

7 Ron Pereira January 4, 2010 at 4:38 pm

Hi Mark, as you know, I have no problem using Japanese words… but I realize many people get their feathers ruffled by it so I try to be as sensitive as I can be depending on the folks involved.

But, as an example, you say hansei means reflection… when, in fact, I learned from my Japanese speaking lean pals it’s probably better translated as repentance. So I think “Westerners” like ourselves need to be careful when we think we understand what these “words” mean.

Finally, as a fun little experiment I searched your blog for a few Japanese words to see how often you’ve used them over the years.

Gemba = 20 pages of results
Kanban = 27 pages of results
Kaizen = 39 pages of results

I stopped there… but I think the point is you seem to have seen some value in these Japanese words, no?

I get what you mean by the new words that seemed to have popped up the last year or two… but to me all this means is people are learning more and more about the richness and power of this awesome methodology we call TPS and/or lean. Is that really such a bad thing?

p.s. Sorry about your Cats… I was pulling for them. Gutsy call at the end.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

8 Amiel January 4, 2010 at 6:39 pm

Mark,

I humbly submit #11: “Rolling out Lean” (or “rolling out” anything). There are at least two problems with roll-outs: first, the focus is on the program/tool you are rolling out rather than the people. Second, what feels like a rollout to me may feel to others like being rolled over.

Alternative: engaging people or, if we want to stick to the original root, enrolling people.

Exception to this rule: if the threat of being rolled over gets the cow back into the barn

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

9 Mark Graban January 4, 2010 at 7:21 pm

Lots of great comments today.

@Amiel — exactly, people are far too often “rolled over” by lean. Rather than rolling out the tool, think of solving the problems.

@Ron — thanks for the bowl game condolences. You’re right, I don’t avoid all Japanese words. There are simple words (like “gemba”) and the complicated/hard to say (“heijunka”) and the outright intimidating (“genchi genbutsu”). I don’t say ban all Japanese terms, by any means. And for certain settings, the Japanese terms are more easily embraced.

Thanks for everyone for their comments and tweets.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

10 Bill White January 4, 2010 at 8:43 pm

This has to be one of the most classic series of caveats re: Lean I have had the pleasure to read recently. That it hammers home the need to be inclusive and collaborative, and supports flexible thinking re: Lean vs dogma is refreshing and “right-on”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

11 Mark Graban January 4, 2010 at 9:45 pm

Thanks, Bill! To my readers, I’ll share that I had the pleasure of meeting Bill last month, a former hospital COO who knows a lot about Lean.

His new organization and their lean management model is something I’ll be learning more about:

http://www.dfw-r.com/LeanCulture.html

Maybe Bill will be a future podcast guest.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

12 japanese words January 5, 2010 at 7:07 am

Great article. I had no idea that Japanese words like sensei had become popular terms. I agree with you that it seems a bit out of place.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

13 Jon Miller January 5, 2010 at 12:23 pm

Do we believe the statement that “Where there is no standard there can be no improvement” as Taiichi Ohno said?

If we do believe it, how can we have a standard without measurement?

If we don’t believe it, are we saying that we can have true management without improvement?

I think the definition of “manage” is far too vague and disagree with the thrust of Mark’s argument regarding 7. “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.”

One can “manage” anything poorly, without measures, without standards, without intelligence, but “barely coping” is different than “progressive management” which requires measurement.

Not everything that is measured gets managed, but what doesn’t get measured gets managed only by chance.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

14 Mark Graban January 5, 2010 at 1:50 pm

Jon – I agree with Ohno’s statement.

I also think you can indeed have a standard without measurement. Not everything that’s important has a simple measure. I think measures are important, we should strive to measure our results, not just hope that patient safety or length of stay improves, for example. Data is good.

But, sometimes the Deming misquote leads people to treasure measures for the sake of measures, as if their measurement automatically leads to improvement. As Dr. Deming would say, by what method? I agree with you that we need good management.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

15 Naida Grunden January 5, 2010 at 2:50 pm

Mark, great post! As a former English teacher, I recognize the need that some writers and speakers have to dazzle their audiences with needlessly complex words and phrases. The introduction of Japanese buzzwords gives mere mortals (those folks we’re trying to get to “buy in,” remember?) the heebie-jeebies, puts them off, makes the speaker sound like a know-it-all. Respect and dignity? Bless my Strunk & White!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

16 Mike Wroblewski January 5, 2010 at 9:19 pm

Nice post Mark. I certainly agree with most of your improvement suggestions however I disagree with avoiding the Japanese words in lean. Like most everyone, it is a personal bias to use or not use them. With the English language made up of mainly foreign words, what’s a few more? I posted in more detail my point of view. http://tinyurl.com/yhemqtd

Keep up the thought provoking posts!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

17 Willi January 6, 2010 at 2:06 pm

Hi Mark,

Justa wanted to show this small presentation I’ve made about Lean SW Development “Lean in 4 minutes”. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBLIJKHS2tc)

I’d appreciate your feedback.

Bye!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

18 Mark Graban January 6, 2010 at 2:29 pm

@Mike W. — thanks for sharing the link, your post is provocative right back at me! Appreciate it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

19 Mark Graban January 6, 2010 at 11:14 pm

Mark Rosenthal’s (The Lean Thinker blog) comments wouldn’t fit here, so he wrote a whole post of his own as a response:

http://theleanthinker.com/2010/01/06/leanblog-org-10-lean-things-not-to-say/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

20 Brian Maready January 8, 2010 at 8:50 am

Hey Mark,

This list is good Hansei. Communication is important in any lean transformation, and how words and phrases are used can help or hurt the effort. A few comments:

Japanese words can be effective, but in most companies should be limited. We try to use only a couple, like kanban, because we haven’t thought of good English equivalents.

Regarding #6, it’s easy for people to fall back on the idea that “people hate change”. In reality, people don’t like being told they have to change. Most people will change if they are engaged in the transformation process and understand the reasons for the change.

In an effort to contribute a little more to this thread, on my new blog I’ve added “10 things Lean Consultants Should Stop Doing”.

http://leanbuilt.blogspot.com/2010/01/10-things-lean-consultants-should-stop.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

21 Mark Graban January 8, 2010 at 10:56 am

@Brian – thanks for sharing that post. I agree completely on point 6, I’ve always said “people don’t like to be told what to do.” People typically love change if they are initiating it or at least have some input. “People hate a change” is a sorry excuse for people to fall back on when THEIR change is not readily accepted by others.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

22 Brian Buck January 8, 2010 at 4:20 pm

Great post Mark. I agree with everything except for the part about Japanese words. I think it is OK to keep the cow out of the barn as long as the use is handled responsibly.

If trying to impress someone with your Japanese vocabulary – don’t use it.

If teaching lean thinking is getting held up because of the words – don’t use them right away and share another time.

I think the use of Japanese language should not be a either/or proposition. I think both English AND Japanese can co-exist provided the speaker/writer evaluates if the audience responds as desired.

As to point number 6, if a leader or consultant has to “sell” lean, then they are seeking compliance and not commitment. I like how you tie “buy-in” as a metaphor for being sold to.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

23 Mark Graban January 8, 2010 at 5:09 pm

@Brian – Great points. I agree it shouldn’t be all or nothing with Japanese words. In all things, balance.

I agree on your comment on Point 6.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

24 Tom Robinson January 8, 2010 at 6:39 pm

Mark, I like much of what you articulate here. I have hardly used any Japanese terms in 20 years of lean consulting (really did study Nagoya engine plant in 1990, creak). The only term for which I never quite found a synonym was hoshin kanri, although “management by method” was an accurate if mystifying translation.

Regarding setting goals for a number of kaizen events, I agree with you in principle. But in practice, IF kaizen events/Rapid Process Improvements are going to be a primary method of engaging many employees in serious process improvements early in an organization’s lean journey, then setting aggressive quantitative targets will work IF you have a method, and probably IF it’s a major hoshin for the organization for two to four years. I think both Virginia Mason and Seattle Children’s have proven this, and probably Boeing. AND those kaizen events/RPIs would not have been, or were not, as successful without strategically thinking through where to conduct those numerous events.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

25 Mark Graban January 9, 2010 at 9:32 am

Another “Top 10″ list — this time a list of resolutions from Pat Wardwell at the GMBP:

http://leanjourneytruenorth.blogspot.com/2010/01/ten-new-years-resolutions-for-lean.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

26 Mark Graban January 9, 2010 at 10:22 pm

Ron Pereira chimed in with his take on this issue:

http://lssacademy.com/2010/01/06/kanji-and-humility/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

27 valuestreamguru January 10, 2010 at 11:40 am

Loving this post, added to our twitter page – i think you could rename the post to 10 things Lean consultants always say! – this reminds of a game called buzzword bingo where you tick of the the things you KNOW the consultant will say!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

28 michael donohue February 25, 2010 at 12:26 pm

Good list.

I first learned of and studied TPS in 1980. Since that time I have lost count of how many companies / individuals I have worked with in a proces of continuous improvement, i.e., the continuous improvement of the constraint limiting the attainment of our (their) goal.

I have 2 belt colors; one is brown and the other is black. They match my shoes.

Frankly, I have little to no use for “lean” practitioners who are focused on the tool set and have no appreciation of what it takes to run a business. Leadership is the ability to create a vision of the future and cause people in the organization to create their own solutions to get where they need to be. If they use “lean” tools, good for them….. but do not confuse “lean” with strategy or vision.

As I said, good article.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

29 Paul Hager May 13, 2010 at 4:27 pm

Erik Hager, a lean “Sensei” was taught by another “Sensei” Hajime Ohba at Toyota. Erik doesn’t use that term for himself but he recognizes the value of being mentored by “one who has gone before” and passed the knowledge on to another. “Sensei” does have value in spite of the fact that it is now an over-used, hackneyed term. Just because it has lost some of it’s original power, does not mean we should not restore it to it’s original place and meaning. Erik is busy helping companies without worrying about titles or certification because the real value is in what you accomplish. He is a “Sensei” because he is seeking to mentor others in the TPS thinking. I’m sorry if it sounds like there is a difference between what Erik knows and your garden variety lean consultant, but the reality is, there is a difference.
A good article otherwise.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

30 Mark Graban May 13, 2010 at 4:41 pm

Paul – thanks for your comment. I’ve met Erik and I know he’s not a hack. As you state, as the term “sensei” gets used more often, it becomes meaningless. As the term is self-appointed, it becomes meaningless.

I value real sensei. I cringe when suddenly everyone is a sensei. Am I a sensei? No.

How do you “restore” the term once the meaning is degraded. You can’t tell people to stop using the term (my blog post is a “wish” not a “command”).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Get a link back to a recent blog post:

Previous post:

Next post: