I was at an organization recently where one of the relatively senior leaders kept using a curious phrase that made my ears perk up.
The senior executives were continually being referred to as “the decision makers.”
To me, that's a really bad sign. That's part of the culture that we're trying to change with Lean and Kaizen principles. To their credit, this organization is trying to create a “culture of continuous improvement.” Their executives “support” continuous improvement and are “supportive” of the idea of everybody being involved improvement.
The question is whether than can shift from being generally “supportive” in principle to learning when to allow decision making to happen lower in the organization.
It inspired me to create this graphic:
In a Lean culture, the executives still play an important role. They have important decisions to make about strategy and really important high-level decisions, although they might “play catchball” to help test ideas and get input from other levels of the organization as appropriate.
But, the executives need to stop micromanaging improvement work that's taking place (or being stifled) at lower levels.
In Lean, we believe that everybody is an expert in their own work. Therefore, the frontline staff are best positioned to identify and solve problems related to their work.
The role of managers shifts from having all the answers and doing all of the work to being a coach and a facilitator. The executives act as servant leaders rather than the people who swoop in to fight fires.
There's a story that I use in presentations and it's in Lean Hospitals as a mini case study about what can go wrong when executives try solving front-line problems from on high (or from across the street in their executive offices):
One U.S. hospital was a few years into its Lean journey, yet the CEO still made many top-down decisions. Patient surveys showed that late-night noise was the biggest cause of complaints. Inpatient unit managers were, needless to say, surprised when workers arrived to install carpet in the hallways. Unfortunately, the new carpet made it physically harder for nurses to push computer carts down those hallways, so they spent more time at the nurses' station. One executive mandate (use technology to get out from the station) ran into conflict with the other mandate (carpeted hallways). Instead of following a plan-do-study-adjust (PDSA) cycle, the carpet was introduced to other floors before the impact on the first unit was fully determined.
Ironically, patient satisfaction data showed that noise complaints dropped starting the month before the carpet was installed. Why? Nurses had taken initiative to make a number of small improvements, such as closing doors and turning TV volumes down at night. So, as nurses were learning Lean principles and their executives said they supported that effort, the senior leaders were not yet thinking Lean themselves.
Here is a slide I use in presentations:
Executives should go to the “Gemba” (the place where the work is done)… or better yet, they can let local teams and managers come up with ideas and solutions, as they did in this mini case. What the nurses did, their small actions, could all be considered “Kaizen” activity.
And, as the chart shows, patient satisfaction (the scores, at least) went up BEFORE the carpet was rolled out (the green line in the chart's x-axis).
Do you hear people in your organization referring to executives as “the decision makers?”
What are you doing to help EVERYBODY make decisions at the appropriate level and the right scope?