Looking Back – What Dr. Deming Taught the Japanese


Last week, I had a chance to see one of the “Deming Library” videos (on loan to me by Claire Crawford-Mason and ManagementWisdom.com). BTW, I'll be interviewing Claire soon about her reflections on working closely with W. Edwards Deming for the production of these videos and the famous 1980 NBC program about Deming).

I watched one video, produced in 1998 (after Dr. Deming's death in 1993): “How Everyone Wins: Finding Joy, Meaning, and Profit in the Workplace.

There are many great points in the video, including a few things I tweeted – thoughts and pictures – while watching.

Some of the great things Dr. Deming said in the video:

“People are different from one another. A leader must be aware of these differences.” They are not interchangeable machine parts.

I have learned from my own career that there are “one size fits all” approaches to managing people in a team. Deming taught that we must understand and manage people as individuals.

Dr. Deming also  said:

“The job the leader is to make his people feel important.”

I suppose one way to do that is to really listen to your employees and to be humble. Ask their opinions and get them involved in improvement – work that matters.

Another lesson from the video is (paraphrasing):

First understand and get agreement about the aim of the system (organization).

We can't know just WHAT do do. We must also agree on WHY.

And here are five screen captures of “What Deming Taught the Japanese”:






I think we can find these five philosophies in modern-day “Lean management” in healthcare or beyond. We can also find some of it (like “decisions based on fact”) in other approaches like Six Sigma. Although, I've learned from Toyota books that “fact” (what you can see and verify with your own eyes) is not necessarily the same as “data” (or just numbers, which might be missing context or other important information).

“Feedback on people,” of course, means more than just an annual review or ranking process. Deming was opposed to the traditional annual review (as are people like Prof. Samuel Culbert – my podcast with him is here) and said we needed to be leaders instead… giving continual coaching and feedback throughout the year, rather than just judging them at year's end.

What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn – and follow me or connect with me there.

Did you like this post? Make sure you don't miss a post or podcast — Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.

Check out my latest book, The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation:

Get New Posts Sent To You

Select list(s):
Previous articlePodcast #156 – Mike Stoecklein, Memories of Working with W. Edwards Deming
Next articleGuest Post: Lacking Baseball Specs Leads to Offensive Explosion (and MLB Scouting Problems)
Mark Graban
Mark Graban is an internationally-recognized consultant, author, and professional speaker, and podcaster with experience in healthcare, manufacturing, and startups. Mark's new book is The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation. He is also the author of Measures of Success: React Less, Lead Better, Improve More, the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, and the anthology Practicing Lean. Mark is also a Senior Advisor to the technology company KaiNexus.


    • Hi Gunther-

      Yes, I blogged it about it last week:


      Bigger doesn’t necessarily mean better. Do customer service and cost always improve when a company or organization gets bigger? Not necessarily.

      Lean and process improvement are a very necessary part of the puzzle, otherwise things get more complex and dysfunctional as we get bigger.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.