Today, they're allowing me to introduce some ideas from my book Measures of Success. Many “Lean thinkers” just haven't been exposed to these ideas. Many haven't read Deming or Wheeler… it's not their fault for not knowing of Process Behavior Charts and methods like this.
But, I hope this post helps people see that “bowling charts” and “red/green” analysis are not the only way (or the best way) to look at metrics.
The article starts:
Lean transformation work is difficult and time consuming. Nobody complains about having too much time in the day. Therefore, we need to prioritize our use of methods like A3 problem solving and other ways of grasping the situation. Managers and change agents often err in reacting to insignificant changes in a metric. Or, they declare victory too quickly when a single data point suggests improvement. As I explain in my new book, Measures of Success, when we stop reacting to “noise” in a metric, we can better focus our improvement efforts, waste less time, and improve more. That should be a core principle of Lean management that can help leaders in any setting.
While the heart of most improvement work is based on tracking and responding to meaningful metrics, I've seen far too many lean efforts fall short due to confusion about metrics and KPIs. And not simply because people use the wrong measures. What's worse is that people tend to apply misguided thinking about mining for gold from the cache of data. Donald J. Wheeler, Ph.D., the author of the fantastic book Understanding Variation, says that Statistical Process Control (SPC) is “way of thinking, with some tools attached.” That reminds me of what people say about Lean — that it's not just tools, but also a new way of thinking.
Are you incorporating these methods into your Lean Management System?
What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn. Don't want to miss a post or podcast? Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.