Am I “Resistant to Change” When it Comes to iPhones?
When I was recently considering switching from an iPhone 6S to a newer iPhone 8 Plus (or an iPhone X), I wrote this post on LinkedIn, which I'll expand upon a bit in this post.
I ended up buying an iPhone 8 Plus, a decision I don't regret so far.
I write a lot about not labeling people as “resistant to change.” People aren't being labeled as “resistant” because we admire their critical thinking skills. It's being use as a negative, as in in “what's wrong with them, why are they resistant?”). That's a shame, since resistance is a natural and expected part of any change process (as we learn through the field of “Motivational Interviewing“). I even see very experienced Lean people (“thought leaders” even) fall into the trap of labeling or implying that people are resistant to change.
It reminds me of the quote attributed to the late Peter Scholtes and others: “People don't resist change, they resist being changed.”
Change can still be difficult, even when change is self initiated and not pushing on you by others.
When it was released, the iPhone 6 Plus seemed enormous and too big of a leap in size from the iPhone 5S that I owned. So I got the iPhone 6 during that upgrade cycle. The 6 was bigger than the 5S, but it was a smaller jump in size than going from the 5S to the 6 Plus would have been.
(These are “First World Problems,” I realize)
Incremental change is easier to accept than big leaps. That's a lesson we learn from Dr. Robert Maurer and his work on Kaizen.
Now, I'm considering an iPhone 8 Plus for a number of reasons (namely its better camera). I'm willing to consider it now because it's incrementally not that much bigger than my iPhone 6S.
There are things I might like about the upcoming, radically different iPhone X, but not having a home button and the idea of facial scanning is scary. I'm comfortable with the home button. It's what I'm used to. It works for me.
This article covers the lack of a home button and pretty much shares my view:
Am I being “resistant to change?”
It's natural to be afraid of change, right?
Would a “small test of change” (such as using the iPhone X in a store or having a 30-day return policy) alleviate some of this fear? Maybe that works for the home button issue, since I have trouble picturing how the phone works without a home button (even after seeing video online about it).
Maybe someday I'll accept that new facial-scanning technology as I somewhat hesitantly accepted the finger scanner on my iPhone 6.
Change is never instantaneous. Change is a process – even when that change is rationally a positive thing.
Beyond psychology and therapy, we can learn that from reflecting on our own behavior… and hopefully we can start thinking about others differently and being more empathetic instead of labeling them as “resistant” or “bad.”
The LinkedIn post drew a lot of comments, some of which I'll share below:
Should we replace ‘resistance to change' with ‘reactions to change'?
I agree! I wouldn't even justify the term by acknowledging it. Resistance in reality is just merely questions unanswered. This is when we revisit our approach in managing and engaging our stakeholders.
Well said! You nailed it when we spoke and you said there is always a root cause to the unease and we should start there.
I'm deliberate. You're cautious. He's resistant.
This is an interesting take because you've made it personal. Does knowing the fact that facial ID is substantially more secure than your fingerprint make any difference? In other words, the data clearly supports facial req as the way to go if you want better security. What makes change frustrating is when the data clearly points to a better method and for no reasonable reason there is resistance. This is when change is forced (i.e., remove the home button). You live with the short term stress – it goes away pretty quickly if the change is indeed a better way.
My reply to Greg:
Psychology teaches us that people naturally get scared by change even when it's rationally a positive thing. So I can realize that facial ID is more secure, but still be hesitant or not like it. “No reasonable reason” implies we all agree what's a reasonable reason… and the “fight or flight” instinct is primal, not reasonable. But I agree that forcing change is the worst strategy.
I have always in my long career, except when I foolishly forgot, sought out the naysayers. They are the ones that can tell you, directly or indirectly, what is wrong with your plan. Only a fool ignores these folks and labels them “resistant.” Yes, they are sometimes annoying. And they make your plan to change things harder to sell. Tough. Seek out the truth regardless of how inconvenient it is for you. Your chances of succeeding will be greatly improved.
This topic has provided very interesting insight from the user/customer's perspective. This kind of information can provide the designers with sufficient information on the expectation of the iPhone users. Mark, great topic, I just hope there is an existing platform out there where designers interact directly with iPhone users.
What do you think?
What do you think? Scroll down to comment or share your thoughts and the post on social media. Don't want to miss a post or podcast? Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.
- Jody Crane, MD: Lean in Emergency Medicine and Hospitals; 3 Big Issues Causing Tough Times in Healthcare - February 1, 2023
- Alternative History: GM Uses Lean to Remain #1 in the Auto Industry - January 31, 2023
- Fall in Love with the Problem, not the Solution: In Entrepreneurship and Continuous Improvement - January 29, 2023