Working 40 Minutes a Day?
There was a feature in the local paper a few weeks back about what different types of employees get paid, here is an example from UPS:
“TIM DIXON, $125,000 Tim Dixon's job used to be a lot more demanding when he started fixing airplanes. But in the 23 years since he became an aircraft mechanic, computer technology has transformed the cockpit so dramatically that he now spends much of his shift puttering around the airport. Dixon, of Ponder, works four days a week at UPS' facility at Dallas/Fort Worth Airport. The company schedules most routine maintenance on weekends. So on weekdays, Dixon gets busy only if there's an unexpected breakdown on a plane. Some days, he said he puts in as little as 40 minutes of real labor during a 10-hour shift. ‘During the week, you're pretty much like insurance for the company in case something happens,' he said.”
This isn't Tim's fault, the employee. How can management afford to have someone work only 40 minutes a day? “Puttering around?” Isn't there an opportunity for training, or cross-training to make productive use of his time? Does Tim enjoy doing nothing, I wonder? Is this an example of restrictive union contracts that are in place? Such muda, such waste.
I can understand that need to have somebody there, “just in case.” But, my goodness, make good use of his time. That's good for the company and, I think, it's a form of showing “respect for people” to not let Tim just “putter around” all day.