It’s nice to see examples of Lean Healthcare success in the news, this time on the front page of the Denver Post — “Denver Health saves millions using Toyota efficiency principles.”

As the city health system, they are both an example of Lean Healthcare and Lean Government, saving the taxpayers money and providing better care, to the tune of cost savings of $54 million over the past five years. I was a guest faculty member on Wednesday for an IHI workshop called “$10 Million in Savings – Reducing Hospital Operating Expenses While Improving Quality.” $10 million — congrats, Denver Health — times five.

Early in the article is a great quote that speaks to those who would fear that Lean is nothing but a new way to drive layoffs:

Without those savings, Denver Health would “absolutely” have had to cut jobs, said its chief executive, Dr. Patricia Gabow.

Reducing waste and providing more value to patients is FAR better than the typical alternative – what some at the IHI event called “mindless slash-and-burn cost cutting.” It doesn’t take too much creativity to cut services and fire people. Eliminating waste, through Lean, is a far better alternative (and that was the type of thing that was being discussed with the IHI group).

How much waste is there in healthcare?

“They know they’ve got to cut costs,” said Dr. James Levett, a cardiac surgeon and past chairman of the American Society for Quality’s health care division.

“In general, I would say we believe there is probably 20 percent to 40 percent waste in health care,” he said. “And if you want to get rid of waste, that’s the key focus of Lean.”

Dr. Gabow, Dr. John Toussaint, and Dr. Don Berwick have been quoted and cited as saying that up to 50% of healthcare activity is “waste.” Remember, reducing waste is not the same as “just doing less” or rationing care. As a nation, we could afford much more care if we could eliminate waste.

The article highlights a number of specific improvements in:

  • Ordering inhalers
  • Laboratory
  • Emergency department
  • Maintenance

In the central maintenance area:

In 2009, the engineering department spent $613,651 less on repair and maintenance and supplies than in the pre- Lean high year of 2005.

The article references the work done by employees and leaders in “Rapid Improvement Events” (aka Kaizen Events). Denver Health has seven full-time employees dedicated to Lean (ThedaCare, for example has many times that many).

To those who think Lean is a top-down command-and-control approach, read this:

Levett said one of the reasons Lean is so often successful is that it’s not management telling the staff how to improve — it’s the other way around.

The article ends reemphasizing the point about layoffs and the importance of “Respect for People:”

While layoffs seem to have become the most convenient cost-cutting strategy rather than a last resort, Lean is an antidote to that approach.

Last year, Denver Health provided but didn’t get paid for $360 million in medical care. That’s up from $270 million in 2005. At the same time, government aid for the public hospital dropped by $18 million, chief financial officer Burnette said.

Still, Denver Health didn’t lay off a single employee.

It’s all part of the core of Lean, Gabow said.

“It’s about respecting people and their value,” she said.

Thanks to Denver Health for sharing their story with the world – hopefully this will inspire more positive change in the healthcare world.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

The real Old Spice guy

Hello, readers. How are you? Fantastic.

The recent series of Old Spice commercials starring Isaiah Mustafa have been a pop culture hit, especially on YouTube and Twitter. Some of us have talked about the need to better market Lean, something I first experimented with in my iPad commercial parody. My friend Jay Parkinson, MD asked me, back in June, “How do you make Lean sexy?” Yeah, seriously.

Well, this might not be how, but I’ve recorded a parody of the Old Spice ads — this will make a lot of sense if you haven’t seen this commercial or this one. OK, so my parody still might not make sense, but take a listen, below…

I don’t have the skills to do a fake video (calling for a talented reader to help, click here) and I could barely photoshop these images together into a “Lean Spice” picture to look at while the audio plays:

The "Lean Spice" guy. Mark Graban is not this lean, not even close.

The transcript for those who can’t hear my artificially-deepened voice:

Hello ladies. How are you? Fantastic. Look at your hospital. Now back to me. Now back at your hospital. Now back to me. Sadly, your hospital isn’t me.

But if your hospital stopped having wasteful, siloed processes everywhere and switched to Lean Spice body wash, your hospital could smell like he’s me.

Look down. Back up. Where are you? You’re in a hospital where emergency room waiting times are half what they used to be while seeing 20% more patients.

Look at your hand, now mine. What’s in it? It’s the construction blueprints that we tore up because we doubled OR throughput by using Lean, saving my hospital millions, which allowed me to buy you these diamonds. I could have built the rooms with my own hands but I didn’t have to thanks to lean.

Should you use Lean Spice? I don’t know, like do you quality improvement and patient safety? Who has reduced patient falls and length of stay while making staff members so happy you’d think they were looking at me all day? Not your hospital, mine. Swan dive. Into the best 5 days of your career, a rapid improvement event led by me.

Anything’s possible when your hospital smells like Lean Spice, not like waste. I’m on a horse.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 4 comments }

Hat tip to Helen Z. for finding this full-page print ad in the New York Times. The full ad appears below in this post, but the primary element of the ad is what you see at left – it says prominently:  ”3 {seconds matter}”. It’s an ad for NYU Langone Medical Center, a hospital that does have a Lean program, it appears from a Google search that turns up this blog post from our friends at the Lean Insider blog.

As you’ll see, the ad depicts an operating room and says:

“That’s why at NYU Langone Medical Center, surgical instruments are hung on the wall, instead of kept in a drawer. This is one of the many ways we enhance performance and efficiency and, ultimately, deliver a higher quality of care.”

So will the public buy it? Will this practice enhance their reputation amongst anyone other than “lean geeks?”

Here is the full ad (click on the picture for an even larger version):


What are your thoughts on the ad and the impression it might give? Is this really the best example of their Lean improvements, or just the most minute and concrete? Does it leave an impression that says “well, if they’re paying attention to the little stuff, they must really avoid big problems” or might people think they’re missing the forest for the trees? Does the ad make you more willing to visit that hospital? Take this quick poll:


If your hospital were to run a full-page ad trumpeting a Lean improvement, what would the ad say? Would you run such an ad in your hometown paper?

I’m usually not afraid to take a stand, but I’m really torn about the ad – part of me says “OK, that’s good” and part of me says I’d rather see an ad trumpeting the achievement of zero central line associated bloodstream infections… does 3 seconds here and there really benefit the patient as much as major quality improvements?

I think that, if this example is indicative of a Lean culture and a true “kaizen” attitude, where you have tons of little ideas implemented by the staff, then maybe the accumulation DOES impact quality in a measurable way. But this little improvement? I don’t mean to discourage their improvement, but is that ad space more of a lost opportunity than a big win?

I’m curious to learn more about their Lean efforts though… maybe I’ll have a stronger view after sleeping on it, but what do you think? Scroll down or visit the blog (if you’re an RSS reader) to leave a comment.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 10 comments }

First off, there’s nothing about “Lean” per se in this linked article from Quality Digest: “New York Pediatric ICU Ward Off Central-Line Infections for Entire Year“. That said, there are elements that are very similar to both Lean and the checklists methodology.

Standardized work has led to so many documented improvements in healthcare. There are still some (who might be lurking and reading this) who scream loudly about Lean turning people into unthinking robots, leading to poor quality. Lean standardized work and checklists aren’t about shutting off your brain – it’s about shifting from a current state where it can be true that “everybody does it different” to a middle ground where there’s a standard method BUT people have the professional judgment to deviate from that when necessary.

The Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children’s Medical Center of New York has reached a real milestone due to these sorts of methods…

From the article:

The Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children’s Medical Center of New York announces it has gone an entire year without a central-line infection in its Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) – the only children’s hospital in New York to achieve this milestone and one of only several in the nation.

This is truly a life-saving measure, as these infections can quite often be deadly. Before their improvements, there was an infection every 28 days. Their goal was to reduce the rate by 50% — but they reached ZERO (the goal any organization should have). How did they reach this mark?

They were smart to not just blindly copy the success of checklists from adult hospitals (as documented in the books The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right and Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals: How One Doctor’s Checklist Can Help Us Change Health Care from the Inside Out). They clearly learned from the approach, but realized how they were different (and not letting “we’re different” be an excuse):

Efforts to reduce the incidence of CA-BSI in adult patients have been successful mostly by improving insertion techniques. “Pediatric CA-BSI is completely different,” Silver explains. “In children, insertion of the central line is the cause of only 10 percent of infections. The remaining 90 percent is attributable to maintenance procedures.”

So they had to focus more on line maintenance, not insertion.

They worked to improve and standardize methods — what’s the best method for protecting the child? If something is an important step or should be done a certain way, how do you make sure it happens EVERY time?

These improvements included a lengthy scrub of the catheter port (“scrub the hub”) with a special cleansing solution for each entry into the catheter (to either administer a medication or to sample blood), very frequent changes of the catheter tubing, and a new protocol for changing the catheter dressing. Additionally, the necessity of the catheter itself became a topic for discussion on daily rounds; and an open conversation between the team of nurses and physicians caring for the patient became a must at the first warning sign of a brewing infection. To implement these last two aspects, however, a culture shift away from the more traditional hierarchical medical model was necessary.

As always, it’s not about just writing a checklist document or having standardized work — you have to focus on the culture. How do you break down hierarchies and foster teamwork, where the team is focused on the customer (the patient and the family)?

“The shift can best be summarized with the catchphrase, ‘if you see something, say something,’” says Silver. “Our success is directly linked to the creation of a culture of safety and mutual responsibility where the opinion of all is actively sought and welcomed. Nurses are able to tell physicians that they contaminated their glove during a line insertion or that the line site looks red and needs to be removed. That ability to freely communicate has spread and improved the functioning of our PICU team throughout all aspects of patient care and has become a standard of quality and safety reengineering at Cohen Children’s Medical Center.”

Again, none of this work was labeled as “Lean” but it would all be familiar to a lean thinker – reducing waste and having respect for people, that’s the key to quality and safety. Not a bunch of warning signs!

Congratulations to the team for the improvements:

The hospital’s infection control efforts have already saved the lives of children and have avoided significant costs to the health care system.

Silver said an added benefit of the collaborative was an improvement in employees’ job satisfaction and a concerted effort to function as a team that takes great pride in its performance.

Another case where it all goes hand in hand:

  • Better quality
  • Lower cost
  • Happier employees

If it can be done at this hospital, why not every hospital? Why not this year??? I don’t care if you call it Lean, checklists, what have you — we just need to get this done. We know how…

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

A blog reader sent me a link to this UK news article — really, it’s a lesson in statistical literacy, so thanks to the BBC for that. In the web piece, “Can chance make you a killer?“, Dr. Deming’s famous lessons from the “Red Bead Game” are illustrated in the context of deciding, based on data, which hospitals or doctors have patient death rates so high that negligence would be implied.

Are you fluent in the terminology and concepts of “common cause” and “special cause” variation? The BBC provides a great primer.

I have facilitated the Red Bead Game a number of times, after having read about it Dr. W. Edwards Deming’s classic Out of the Crisis. I own a copy of the kit, as pictured above, which I used at a healthcare conference a few years back.

Some of the lessons learned from running this game:

  • Arbitrary quality targets are useless if the system is not capable of delivering that level of quality
  • People are often punished or rewarded for situations that are just “dumb luck” instead of anything reflecting their skill or ability

The BBC article lays out an example and an interactive simulator to help you walk through this situation:

We’ve devised a chance calculator to simulate this scenario. It is set up so that you are innocent of any failing. But bad luck might convict you all the same.

In the real world all kinds of factors make a difference, like surgical skill. But in the calculator, every patient in every hospital has exactly the same chance of dying and every surgeon is equally good. This is to show what chance alone can do, even when the odds are the same all round.

  • The calculator (below) shows 100 hospitals each performing 100 operations
  • The probability that a patient dies is initially fixed at five in 100
  • The government, meanwhile, says death rates 60% worse than the norm are unacceptable (in red)
  • So any hospital which has eight deaths or more out of 100 ops – when the expected average is only five – is in trouble.
  • We’ve assigned one hospital to you, with a box around it – it could come out green or red.

This is just brilliant. Instead of reading what I’d have to say, go to the BBC site and play around with the simulator. Hit “recalculate” many times. How often is “your” hospital deemed “good” or “bad” due to just random chance?

Come back here and comment, though, please if you have thoughts to share.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

MP3 FileAAC File

Also available as Video Podcast #11, Episode #95 of the LeanBlog Podcast features Norman Bodek talking about some of the ideas in his most recent book, How to do Kaizen: A new path to innovation – Empowering everyone to be a problem solver. Late in the podcast, Norman asks and answers an interesting question: what if an employee suggests “we should blow up the factory”??

This was recorded in March 2010, with Norman appearing from his office in Portland, OR.

For earlier episodes, visit the main Podcast page, which includes information on how to subscribe via RSS or via Apple iTunes.

You can use the player (use the VCR-type controls) at the top of the post to listen to a “streaming” version of the podcast (or click here for the streaming audio and RSS subscription). The streaming link is faster for one-time listening (hardly any delay to start listening). Or you can use the download link to put it on your iPod or other MP3 player.

If you have feedback on the podcast, or any questions for me or my guests, you can email me at leanpodcast@gmail.com or you can call and leave a voicemail by calling the “Lean Line” at (817) 776-LEAN (817-776-5326) or contact me via Skype id “mgraban”. Please give your location and your first name. Any comments (email or voicemail) might be used in follow ups to the podcast.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Mark’s note: Today’s guest post comes to us from Ireland and a lean consultant and author named Andy Brophy. He has a new book called Innovative Lean, for which he interviewed me and some client team members from Children’s Medical Center Dallas to talk about some kaizen mechanisms we put in place there, one of many case studies in the book. Hope you enjoy the post…

So many employees aren’t accustomed to being even asked for their ideas. The average American worker submits one formal written idea every 8 years and of these less than 1/3 are implemented! Employees see problems and opportunities every day in their immediate work areas that their managers do not. When employees are not given the opportunity to be heard and the time to implement their ideas, they lose faith in management and are thus not fully engaged in their work.

The foundation of a good idea system is based on the realization that there is far more capability/capacity in our people than is actually being harnessed. The essence of the Lean philosophy is developing within each employee an improvement-seeking and waste-elimination mindset. If everyone even improved their job 0.1% everyday, that adds up to a 25% improvement per employee year on year. That equates to a colossal competitive advantage over time and competitors cannot copy these compounded small improvements.

Why do Employees Step Forward with Ideas?

  • Trust that they will be listened to and acted upon
  • They want to eliminate impractical things that they have to do
  • To make their jobs easier and more interesting
  • There is nothing more annoying than watching money been wasted
  • They want to be listened to, feel valued by being involved in decision making, and be recognised for their contributions

Idea Management is not Simply More Cost Cutting Measures

Gathering and harvesting employee ideas is not just about cost cutting. All service and manufacturing organisations incur two types of cost:

  • Costs that deliver value to the customer. These costs are good and are to be welcomed and even increased if they help differentiate the organisations offerings.
  • Costs that are incurred, but don’t end up delivering value to customers, are waste. Idea Management should be focused on dissolving these wastes thereby improving the performance of the workplace.

Many cost-cutting exercises don’t distinguish between these two forms of cost, or worse still attack the first cost type exclusively, which is why many cost cutting efforts end up causing more destruction than good over the longer term.

Operational waste can take many forms, including waiting, excess walking, unnecessary services, rework and defects, energy, excess inventory, etc. There is no end to improvement opportunities if we become sensitized to waste, as this thought provoking quote from Shigeo Shingo reveals: “If the nut has 15 threads on it, it cannot be tightened unless it is turned 15 times. In reality, though, it is that last turn that tightens the bolt and the first one that loosens it. The remaining 14 turns are waste.”

Idea management’s purpose is to deliver continuous incremental innovation, employee involvement and up-skilling to the workplace. Employees are coached to put forward ideas that make their job easier, can be implemented quickly, eliminate the cause of problems, save money, and don’t cost much to implement.

We commonly hear: “That’s already happening here, we just don’t write the ideas down.” However, is there anything else important like; for example, an expense system, that you don’t have a process for? Ideas are too important to be left to chance and in the absence of a defined process they will be pushed to the back burner.

Traditional methods such as suggestion boxes don’t work. Employees feel they would be better off dropping their ideas into a paper shredder if they never hear about previously submitted ideas. Suggestion systems also get stuck in their own bureaucracy. There are long implementation times, low participation rates (typically less than 5 per cent of the workforce) and high rejection rates. Most traditional suggestion systems fall prey to ideas for other people to do something about, rather than the originator of the idea. If all you have to do is suggest an idea for someone else to implement, you can say whatever you like.

One way to improve it is to use the Kaizen approach to idea management where emphasis is placed on total workforce participation and idea activity is an expected part of the job. There are high participation levels, typically more than 50 per cent of the workforce.

This is because roles and responsibilities for the idea system are outlined at all levels. Ideas are visually displayed on boards, implemented fast, and recognized. New skills are learned by employees through interacting with support functions when implementing their ideas. People are coached to recognize “hidden” waste and the idea system is integrated into daily problem solving. Idea activity is also measured. The employee’s direct manager mentors and supports the idea originator during implementation. Small ideas don’t take enormous time and resources to implement and are not a burden on management, the opposite in fact.

There are also very high approval rates for ideas put forward. Employees are coached as to what constitutes a good idea. “Bad ideas” are viewed as training opportunities; the intent behind the idea is teased out and put forward again. Peer accountability is expressed through employees posting their ideas in the work area. Ideas are often tested and implemented prior to putting forward into the idea system.

Well run idea management systems are realizing substantial returns. Subaru’s employees save more than $5000 per employee, while American Airlines saves on average $55 million a year. Ideas Systems have tremendous potential in hospitals in terms of tapping into the situational knowledge of the front line employees and helping to create a culture where problems are reported and solved versus being worked around. In 2009 the Idea System at The Baptist Healthcare Hospital in Florida realised over $25 million in cost improvements.

Surprisingly, the best performing idea systems don’t pay a percentage of savings for ideas. With monetary rewards, there are winners and losers, so to overcome this you should make ideas and creativity part of the job.

The key is to tap into people’s intrinsic motivation, the natural desire that they have to make a positive difference. The greatest reward for employees is to see their ideas used. An example of recognition is a variety of token items and monthly raffles for implemented ideas. Use these recognition methods tailored to enhance each individual’s motivation to participate. As long as the intended recognition has meaning to people it can cause them to do extraordinary things. Think what people will go through to win coveted sporting medals.

With monetary rewards there are winners and losers. Paying for ideas also adds layers of bureaucracy, rules out the sharing of ideas (as already paid for), prohibits teamwork and can encourage fraud for example by sabotaging equipment so as to submit improvement ideas for payment.

Extrinsic rewards such as cash also fade fast and become expected. Cash has low lasting impact value, indeed research studies have concluded that non cash recognition delivers a 6:1 ROI over direct cash awards. Intrinsic motivation is the natural desire that people have to do a good job and make a positive difference. It is the buzz a person gets from making an improvement in their workplace.

An example idea process flow is as follows.

Employees write down ideas every time they find a problem or see an opportunity for improvement and post them on the local idea board. Whenever possible, an example of the before and after situation is captured.

The person with the idea evaluates and filters the idea with peers (this saves supervisor evaluation time and improves idea quality). Their supervisor then responds within 24 hours of the idea having been brought forward.

Consider the ripple effect for all ideas and the impact they might have if shared elsewhere.

The person who comes up with the original idea should implement the idea themselves or with their work team. If additional help is needed from maintenance, IT etc, the person who put forward the idea oversees the completion of this.

Then, record implemented ideas in an idea log electronically.

Monthly metrics track that the goal of two ideas per month/person is reached and display the results. Metrics for success include: number of ideas per employee/team, volume of implemented ideas, participation rate and implementation time.

If the cycle above flows smoothly, the improvement activity will also flow; one idea will lead to another and continuous improvement will translate into improved performance and higher employee engagement.

The recently published book Innovative Lean: A Guide to Releasing the Untapped Gold in Your Organisation, to Engage Employees, Drive Our Waste and Create Prosperity by Andy Brophy & John Bicheno develops the process and roadmap to establishing an Idea Management System. It is available from Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

I was asked a really good question today, a simple question that probably has a complex answer:

How many hospitals have gotten discouraged and quit their Lean efforts?

It’s a simple question that doesn’t have a simple answer. OK, maybe the answer is “17.” I don’t know.

The question is a corollary to the question of  How many hospitals are implementing Lean?

Answering either question requires to start with “Well, it depends what you mean by…”

What do you mean by “implementing Lean?” To one hospital, they might mean they’re dabbling with training people across many departments in just one tool. That’s not a very robust or holistic approach. “Implementing Lean” might also mean that you are trying to transform the culture and management system through years of improvement efforts, education, leadership, and hard work (like ThedaCare, Group Health and others).

Looking at the quit side of the question – again, what do you mean by “Lean efforts?”

If a hospital was just dabbling with 5S or kanban systems in a department or two, they weren’t like to see transformational change or huge quality improvements or cost savings. If they “quit” that, you could ask “did they ever get started?”

I guess these questions (the “how many”) are interesting to researchers who are looking at broader trends. But, tell me, for YOUR hospital, does it matter one bit what the answer to either question is? Are you starting or stopping Lean efforts because of a bandwagon effect or because you know or believe Lean works when you really go at it with dedication and the right perspective?

How would you answer the “how many” questions?

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 7 comments }

I’m very interested in the interface between healthcare architecture, space design, and processes. I’ve seen so many cases where poor design (often done without the input of nurses, medical technologists, and other front-line staff) leads to systemic inefficiency. Classic bad examples would include not having enough local storage space in a department for equipment and supplies that are truly needed or not having the chemotherapy center close enough to the oncology clinics. A great example of Lean patient-centered design is the cancer center at Park Nicollet, where “care comes to the patient” (yes, it makes a great ad slogan too).

I recently discovered a book, a “manifesto” the author calls it, titled Efficient Healthcare – Overcoming Broken Paradigms. It’s not only the Lean people who get frustrated with the sorry state of typical layouts and space planning – it’s this architect and author, David Chambers from Rice University.

The book is a slim tome (just over 100 pages), but the pages are packed full of text (so there’s more content than you’d expect from a manifesto of this length). I’ve read 40 pages, but felt compelled to share it with you already.
“Efficient Healthcare” alludes to and dances around Lean terminology in the introduction and the first chapter, then it hits on Lean and Toyota methods directly in Chapter 2. There are many gems and insights that are conceptually aligned with what would you have read in Lean books – but the latter half of the book appears to get into more details about the design and construction process. The target for this book seems to be architects while other Lean books, like mine, are more directly targeted at hospital staff and leadership. So I think this book fills an important role – a book you can give to the architects and construction people you work with.
Some of the things I highlighted as I read:

From the first chapter (called “A Call for Change: Incrementalists Need Not Apply”):

“What if the build that houses clinical programs were to reduce the staffing need and required cycle times for care per outcome by 50% or even more?”

Yes – there’s so much systemic waste in healthcare, aiming for 5% productivity improvement when designing a new space isn’t aiming high enough. Looking to the manufacturing world for parallels, the transition from a functional “job shop” layout to a cellular layout with one-piece flow often leads to 50% productivity improvements (with less waiting time and better quality… and lower cost). Lean design is transformational, not incremental. We can save incremental for continuous improvement or “kaizen” activities. Design and construction can be a “kaikaku,” or radical change, event when we are given the chance.

For example, ThedaCare (not referenced in the book from what I read), held an open house last week for the new patient tower designed and built around the Collaborative Care model – this was such a huge opportunity for them to take advantage of. If they didn’t build it right this time, they would have been just stuck with many of the core design decisions for the life of the building.

Chambers emphasizes key Lean principles without yet referencing Lean, such as:

“…this manifesto is not about cutting jobs… By building a care model that works far better than the current model, we can deliver quality care without overworking staff (which is too often the case)…”

I think Chambers might agree with my complaint about healthcare architecture awards being given for pretty spaces, as he writes:

“… I am engaging in vastly more than mere rhetoric about the healing environment… goes far beyond making spaces attractive or aesthetically pleasing…”

Chambers rightfully complains about the existing view of a hospital build as a group of departments, as overhead rather than “…view them as the machines by which we provide care.” He continues, “…and we learn that someone has invented a much more efficient and effective machine – then they become far more than mere costs in the conversation, they are an essential aspect of the value proposition.”

He’s speaking to the role of the building (and value streams, as he covers more in Chapter 2) as it creates and encourages productivity, which correlates very well to better quality. Beyond looking at the value stream, Chambers is correct in pointing out that the patient is often missing from the design discussion and there’s a huge opportunity in getting them involved.

He ends the chapter with:

“The potential for value, therefore, is far greater in rethinking care delivery processes and flows than it is in value engineering the building.”

I like how he thinks. We have to design a systemic whole, not just a bunch of locally efficient pieces.
My goal here was to introduce you to this book, to tempt you to get a copy yourself. I’ll reach out to the author about a possible podcast interview. I’ll most likely post again about Chapter 2, where Chambers addresses Lean in healthcare more directly. The introduction and Chapter 1 should sound very familiar (and congruent) to Lean thinkers.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 4 comments }

Society for Health Systems

I’ve participated in the last two Society for Health Systems conferences, as a presenter, and I’m looking forward to attending the 2011 event in Orlando, FL next February (17 to 20). It’s an excellent event – both the content and the networking around healthcare quality improvement. Their logo looks like a hurricane – a hurricane of learning?

Anyhoo… I’m the chair for the Patient Flow track this year and I want your help in rounding up (or submitting) outstanding presentations. You might expect I’d head the Lean & Six Sigma track, but they already had a volunteer. While the Patient Flow track isn’t exclusively about Lean, there are opportunities for presentations about Lean and other methods for improving Patient Flow.

To learn more, visit the SHS website, which has info about the conference and about how to submit an abstract – the deadline is coming soon — AUGUST 7.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }