By September 15, 2009 3 Comments Read More →

Did the Reporter or GM Blow it on a Definition of TPS?

Calif. to get dose of auto anguish | Detroit Free Press |

Here’s a recent story about the demise of NUMMI, in which, the reporter wrote:

“On the manufacturing side, GM did sustain much of what it learned from Toyota in its Global Manufacturing System, a standardized set of practices that literally choreograph workers’ jobs to maximize efficiency, minimize physical movement and focus on using inventory only as needed.”

That sounds like the old complaint of “turning workers into robots.” That doesn’t sound like Lean to me. Did the reporter get it wrong or did GM tell the reporter a skewed view of Lean?

The Toyota Production System is all about standardized work but (probably more importantly) it’s also focused on engaging every worker in continuously improving their own work. Did GM not learn that from Toyota at NUMMI?
The article sort of implies that geniuses like GM’s Mark Hogan were able to figure it all out for those dumb workers, who needed to be choreographed. My old GM plant manager who learned at NUMMI didn’t expect to come up with all of the answers. His job was to teach and to ask the right questions.
TPS isn’t just a new form of Taylorism where the employees are expected to unthinkingly execute the choreography of the educated class. The article gives a different, and wrong, impression.

Kevin Meyer, at Evolving Excellence, coincidentally blogged about this yesterday, too.

Subscribe via RSS | Lean Blog Main Page | Podcast | Twitter @MarkGraban

Please check out my main blog page at

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author’s copyright.

Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please scroll down to post a comment. Click here to be notified about posts via email. Learn more about Mark Graban’s speaking, writing, and consulting.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Mark Graban's passion is creating a better, safer, more cost effective healthcare system for patients and better workplaces for all. Mark is a consultant, author, and speaker in the "Lean healthcare" methodology. He is author of the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, as well as The Executive Guide to Healthcare Kaizen. His most recent project is an book titled Practicing Lean that benefits the Louise H. Batz Patient Safety Foundation, where Mark is a board member. Mark is also the VP of Improvement & Innovation Services for the technology company KaiNexus.

Posted in: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , ,

3 Comments on "Did the Reporter or GM Blow it on a Definition of TPS?"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    John Shook had a much better crisp definition of TPS in his most recent blog post:

    "The Toyota Production System starts and ends with people building quality into the process."

  2. Mark Welch says:

    Sad. Such a total miss by the Detroit Free Press. We can't expect reporters to know the ins and outs of everything they report on, but this is an excellent example of how the press can shape public opinion for the worse when they lack deeper understanding of what they are covering. Unfortunately in this information age, misinformation is accelerated more quickly and abundantly.

  3. Anonymous says:

    I cannot really say who got it wrong. It all really depends on who within GM you are talking to about lean. In general I think GM has missed the boat in terms of worker engagement and has focused lean as totally an HPU measurement. I have been in GM plants that are filthy dirty and the Plant Manager will brag about how his HPU is the best in the Harbour report. Unfortunately people working for Harbour reinforce this thinking and give them positive feedback and tell them they are really lean becasue they are close to or better than Toyota in HPU. There is also an emphasis that lean is only related to the manufacturing floor. Hence the big disconnect between GM's Production System and their Purchasing Policies. The two do not support each other and the Purchasing policies drive more cost into the system while minimizing piece cost. I could go own but you get the picture that GM's Lean and Toyota's Lean are still far apart.

Post a Comment