By August 20, 2007 4 Comments Read More →

Smaller Airline Batches Hurt the System?

Small Jets, More Trips Worsen Airport Delays – AOL Money & Finance

Here’s a free version of an article that originally appeared in the WSJ last week. Going back to the book Lean Thinking, Womack and Jones talked about their desire for more “point to point” air travel in small planes, rather than huge planes (like the Airbus A380) going through “hub and spoke” systems, that they compared to “batch and queue” manufacturing systems (very un-Lean). There has even been development of “air taxi” services that would take this concept to more of an extreme (I hope they’d be more comfortable than your typical RJ).

But, even with the increased use of Regional Jets, there are strains on airport infrastructure and the Air Traffic Control system. Granted, some of this is due to the use of RJ’s on hub and spoke routes, giving more flight options (smaller planes, higher frequency), compared to larger batches (larger planes, fewer flights per day). The airlines say they’re following customer demand to have more flights, but some experts are calling for “bigger batches.”

“Promoting larger aircraft is the only means to increase passenger access to La Guardia,” said the FAA proposal.

Do we need bigger batches or do we need to fix the system so we can accommodate smaller batches? Which Lean principles would you apply? Smaller batches seems Lean, but you can’t exceed airport capacity (not Lean).

Subscribe via RSS | Lean Blog Main Page | Podcast | Twitter @MarkGraban

Please check out my main blog page at

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author’s copyright.

Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please scroll down to post a comment. Click here to be notified about posts via email. Learn more about Mark Graban’s speaking, writing, and consulting.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Mark Graban's passion is creating a better, safer, more cost effective healthcare system for patients and better workplaces for all. Mark is a consultant, author, and speaker in the "Lean healthcare" methodology. He is author of the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, as well as The Executive Guide to Healthcare Kaizen. His most recent project is an book titled Practicing Lean that benefits the Louise H. Batz Patient Safety Foundation, where Mark is a board member. Mark is also the VP of Improvement & Innovation Services for the technology company KaiNexus.

Posted in: Blog
Tags: , ,

4 Comments on "Smaller Airline Batches Hurt the System?"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. curiouscat says:

    It seems to me the problem is related to the airport system. Could an appropriate analogy be an old style factory layout that did not allow for quick changeover, required huge batches… You can’t leave the whole factory (machines, layout…) all the old way and just start sending in small batches and wondering why the system gets all jammed up.

    It seems to me the whole system might need to be redesigned like an old factory layout needs to be. The air traffic control system, airport layouts (number of gates, number of runways, one huge airports for many cities), hub and spoke scheduling (which also batches up arrival departure times…).

    Obviously this won’t happen overnight so a path where we move toward such a system would be needed. I really know next to nothing about the systems involved so I could be way off.

  2. Andy Wagner says:

    Your quote from the FAA is very specific. Larger aircraft are needed to make more room at La Guardia, but, no offense, who wants to go to La Guardia? New York has three major airports. Are there really that many people flying into New York? I’ve been to LGA half a dozen times on business… from Boston… on my way to someplace else. When I visit New York, I drive.
    Hub-and-spoke does two things which needlessly crowd airports. First, it sends hundreds of people who don’t want to be there into an airport. Second, in order to make connections timely, inbound and out bound flights are scheduled to arrive and depart together, in batches, crowding facilities, runways, etc.
    Most airports have a lot of landing slots available, but not at peak times, like first thing in morning, after the work day, etc. when their batches of flights come in and out of the city.

  3. Mark Graban says:

    Good points, Andy. So it sounds like level loading the airports would help, but customers mainly want to fly at the peak times, right?

  4. David says:

    There’s always a a lot of discussion about the need for improvement in the ATC computer systems, but the primary constraint in air traffic exists in the form of concrete. A given runway can only handle so many takeoffs and landings per hour–spacing of traffic does need to increase for very large aircraft (due to wake turbulence) but the number of passengers that can be handled per hour by a given runway is still certainly higher with larger aircraft. And political factors make it difficult to either add new runways at an existing airport, or to build new airports.

Post a Comment