Toyota Raises Prices – Yep, That Same Excuse


Toyota Bumps Prices For 11 Models | The Truth About Cars

Ok, since I was accused (rightfully so) of picking on just GM for this, Toyota has also used the “rising materials cost” excuse for raising prices on some models.

A Toyota spokesman said:

“Price changes were made to keep up with current economic conditions and the rising cost of major components… Materials in global markets have gone up. We have made an effort to absorb some to the cost while still protecting our price position.”

Don't get me wrong — companies are allowed to raise prices. It's their choice based on their view of the market. I'll quit beating this drum, but it fascinates me that it's socially acceptable to give the “our costs went up” reason.

We don't hear as often of price reductions because raw material costs go down (well, maybe except in the electronics industry where technology is moving fast…) Has this ever been offered as a reason to cut prices in the auto industry? Let's keep the discussion there.

Subscribe via RSS | Lean Blog Main Page | Podcast | Twitter @MarkGraban

Please check out my main blog page at

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author's copyright.


Get New Posts Sent To You

Mark Graban is an internationally-recognized consultant, author, and professional speaker who has worked in healthcare, manufacturing, and startups. His latest book is Measures of Success: React Less, Lead Better, Improve More. He is author of the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, as well as The Executive Guide to Healthcare Kaizen. He also published the anthology Practicing Lean that benefits the Louise H. Batz Patient Safety Foundation, where Mark is a board member. Mark is also a Senior Advisor to the technology company KaiNexus.

  1. J Thatcher says

    Heh, it’d be a rather silly reason to offer for cutting prices. Usually you chalk up lower prices to being “really super awesome!!!” or whatever nice term the marketing crew comes up with (“we love our customers,” “breakthrough technology,” etc.).

    It is an interesting dichotomy – “Our costs went up” is the market acceptable explanation for increases, but is a completely non-optimized strategy for explaining decreases.

  2. Taiichi Ohno says

    Henry Ford arguably practiced this principal with the Model T. It was introduced in 1909 at ~$850 and eventually reduced to $300 by the 1920’s when it reached peak production. This improvement can be considered “raw material” related considering he was vertically integrated and applied his continuous improvement philosophy to wood and steel just the same as his assembly line.

  3. Mark Graban says

    Great point. I’m sure Henry Ford only lowered prices because he knew he could sell more product at that lower, yet still profitable price as he increased production efficiency and materials efficiency. I’d be curious to go back to his books to re-study his motivations and writings around the Model T price reductions and the relationship to cost.

  4. Bob Graban says

    Good opinion piece on this subject, Figuring out automakers’ pricing puzzle

  5. […] This only works if you are a true monopoly producer. But, far too many companies claim they “have” to raise prices to you, the customer, because of cost increases on their side. This even happens in medicine. Even at Toyota, at times. […]

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

I accept the Privacy Policy

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Celebrating 15 Years of Lean Podcasting!! Learn More
+ +