Another good article in the WSJ that brings up lean concepts, without mentioning lean. This time, it's focused on overworked employees in areas like consulting and finance.
A lot of times, it seems that “office lean” efforts are just as superficial as some factory lean efforts… we try 5S, we put in a kanban system, but we don't tackle the real structure of the work and the “Value Add.”
Most of us know the term “muda”, which is Japanese for waste or “non-value-added” activity. Remember, for something to be “Value Added”, 1) the customer must be willing to pay for it, 2) it must change the product in some way and 3) it must be done right the first time. Anything else is muda and should be reduced or eliminated.
A lesser-known, but related term is “muri”, which means overwork or overburden. In a repetitive assembly environment, it is relatively easy to make sure that you don't give more work to an associate than they can do in the given cycle time. For example, on a 45-second moving line, you don't want to give someone 60 seconds of work.
It's harder, though, in an office environment. Our work is less repetitive and less standardized. How do you know if someone really has 50 hours of work a week? For one, work will expand to fill the available time (people make themselves look busy out of fear). But sometimes, “the cup runneth over” and we end up working evenings and weekends.
Some companies, including those cited in the article (Alcan, Cummins, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Texas Instruments and International Business Machines), are looking to reduce this “muri”, which leads to burned out employees, such as the guy up working at 2 AM.
What's admirable is that they companies are looking at reducing “muda” or non-value-added activities from the employees' weeks. Reducing muda gives more time to work on creating value, or at least getting the workweek down to something sustainable. To me, this is more at the core of “Lean Thinking” than just doing “Office 5S”.
“While corporate efforts to streamline work aren't new, the latest moves are different in two ways. They are driven by employee dissatisfaction, not budget-cutting. And they have two purposes — not only increasing productivity, but improving work-life balance.””
Why do you have to attack muda?
“You can't create a policy that says, ‘No more overwork.' It's too deeply embedded” in how companies operate, Mr. Harrington says. Tackling it requires deeper change.
Things done to identify and reduce muda, as stated in the article, include:
- Identifying and cutting out redundant work
- Setting up back-up personnel for tasks, to help level out workloads
- Workteams identifying improvement opportunities on their own (kaizen)
- Leadership asking employees what needs fixing
- CEO Austin Ligon begins some monthly meetings by asking, “What are we doing that is stupid, unnecessary or doesn't make sense?” The question draws a laugh and gets employees engaged in improving their workplace, he says.
- Identifying “why” things are done (for a customer or because the boss wants it?)
There are more specific examples in the actual WSJ article.
I hope you can use this for inspiration in your own office environment. What are the unnecessary meetings? What reports could people really do without? Are you asking your employees to do more than can realistically be accomplished in a normal workday or workweek?
Did you like this post? Make sure you don't miss a post or podcast — Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.
Check out my latest book, The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation: