web analytics
By August 20, 2013 5 Comments Read More →

Chart: A Few Seconds Here and There Can Really Add Up

Hat tip to Tony Manos of 5S Supply for sharing (via twitter) this interesting table that shows how a few minutes (or even a few seconds) can really add up across a period of five years.

My friend Paul Akers has a great little book called 2 Second Lean: How to Grow People and Build a Fun Lean Culture Chart: A Few Seconds Here and There Can Really Add Up lean. Paul shares the classic Kaizen advice that even a time savings of two seconds is worth celebrating because the benefits add up over time.

This chart, created by the site  xkcd, shows how that time adds up, with the left axis being the amount of time saved and the top axis being the frequency of your task:

is it worth the time Chart: A Few Seconds Here and There Can Really Add Up lean


mark graban lean blog Chart: A Few Seconds Here and There Can Really Add Up leanAbout LeanBlog.org: Mark Graban is a consultant, author, and speaker in the “lean healthcare” methodology. Mark is author of the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, as well as the new Executive Guide to Healthcare Kaizen. Mark is also the VP of Customer Success for the technology company KaiNexus.

book mark graban Chart: A Few Seconds Here and There Can Really Add Up lean mark graban consulting Chart: A Few Seconds Here and There Can Really Add Up lean

pixel Chart: A Few Seconds Here and There Can Really Add Up lean
pinit fg en rect gray 28 Chart: A Few Seconds Here and There Can Really Add Up lean
Please consider leaving a comment or sharing this post via social media.
Posted in: Blog
Tags:

5 Comments on "Chart: A Few Seconds Here and There Can Really Add Up"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    A challenge for some Lean folks I have seen from industry is that any time saving is worth pursuing and priority is not all that important. This belief is based on the concept that we are going to fix everything anyway so priority really isn’t relevant.

    The complexity and current state of healthcare is that so many things need improving that prioritization is essential. I would change the chart for healthcare to be a one-year break even point instead of 5 years.

    • Mark Graban
      Twitter:
      says:

      I see your point, anonymous… I think the beauty of “small Kaizen” (daily Kaizen, etc.) as we talk about in our “Healthcare Kaizen” book is that lots of people can work on little 2-second improvements simultaneously. I think there’s a need to prioritize larger improvements, but if we’re all doing Kaizen within our work, I think prioritization is less important.

      And, as I should have mentioned in the post, some have pointed out on Twitter that improving the value added work itself (the topic of this chart) is not the only way to improve. There’s a huge opportunity in the Lean approach to reduce delays and the non-value added steps… but that doesn’t mean we should ignore opportunities to improve the way the actual work is done.
      Mark Graban recently posted..25 Key Leader Behaviors that Encourage Continuous ImprovementMy Profile

  2. Anonymous says:

    You’re right on Mark.

    Top down and bottom up. We need systems in healthcare that deliver both. Much of the bottom up is lots of seconds of waste elimination opportunity and not that difficult to do and sustain if we have the right culture and systems in place.

  3. Mark Graban
    Twitter:
    says:

    Someone asked me if the math adds up… it basically does.

    It’s measured across five years.

    1 second per day * 50 times/day = 50 seconds/day * 365 days * 5 years = 91250 seconds = 25.3 hours or approximately 1 day

    That assumes you’re doing something 24x7x365 instead of just an 8-hour work day… but still a fun chart.
    Mark Graban recently posted..Gemba Wine: Variation in Wine Seals and Variation in Customer NeedsMy Profile

  4. Rafael
    Twitter:
    says:

    Good stuff! The question that I have “Is the time that you save going to process more of what you looking for?” I was working with a client that was on a same track of reducing cycle time. He was focused on reducing cycle time for several stations which is great. My question was if you save 10%, 15%, 50% of cycle time, are you going to see 1, 10, 10 more units at the end of the line? If so, what is the math?

    My point is focus on improvements which is going to have the biggest bang for your buck.

Post a Comment

CommentLuv badge