TRANSCRIPT: Obama’s Inaugural Address:
I guess this is a “mashup” of sorts… between Dr. W. Edwards Deming and President Obama…
The President said yesterday, in his inauguration speech:
“We will … wield technology’s wonders to raise health care’s quality and lower its cost.”
I absolutely agree that we can do both — improve QUALITY and reduce COST in healthcare. Look at what hospitals like ThedaCare are doing in this regard. Simple things like checklists are reducing surgical errors, which is the right thing to do for the patients and also reduces costs.
These goals are important. It’s critical to realize that there aren’t necessarily tradeoffs between cost and quality. By improving processes (in any industry), quality and cost will both improve. Better quality cost less.
So when faced with goals, Dr. Deming would famously ask “by what method??” It’s not enough to have goals.
President Obama cited “technology.” Technology won’t be enough. Electronic Medical Records alone won’t help. Technology like robots in the pharmacy might actually improve quality, but at a higher cost.
The “technology” that we need to remember is Lean. Process improvement methodologies can be considered a technology, right? It’s not a silver bullet either, but can we use Lean to help transform healthcare in the United States? Yes, we can.
Subscribe via RSS | Lean Blog Main Page | Podcast | Twitter @MarkGraban
About LeanBlog.org: Mark Graban is a consultant, author, and speaker in the “lean healthcare” methodology, focused on improving quality and patient safety, improving access, reducing costs, and fully engaging healthcare professionals. He is also the Chief Improvement Officer for KaiNexus.
LeanBlog on Facebook
Add Mark on Google+
"Move to Healthcare" Network
Lean Blog YouTube Channel
RSS
Newsletter
Twitter
Facebook
Google+
LinkedIn
YouTube
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
I’m a techy guy, and I certainly hope effort and resources are invested in process improvement and not just technology. Great post.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Is there anyone on the inside of Obama’s (excellent but lawyerly) technocracy that gets this?
I like the way Pascal Dennis said it in the policy deployment class I took from him a few years ago (paraphrasing): There is no shortage of technological ingenuity – car companies use the same robots, same suppliers, etc, but some companies are winning, and others are losing. THe gap is not in technical ingenuity but social ingenuity – how do the PEOPLE involved come together to establish goals, identify and solve problems.
Obviously some people in the “lean healthcare” community get this. But there is a powerful tendency to go for the capital intensive techno fix in this country (everywhere, probably) and not everyone is going to make it through Imai’s _Gemba Kaizen_.
So, back to my original question: Is there someone on the inside of the new administration who gets it?
-ALB
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Great question, Andrew. I don’t know about the Obama administration, but I’d be cynical about the hope that there are real process thinkers involved.
I was equally cynical about that in the W. administration, so this is non-partisan cynicism!
Paul O’Neill was a process thinker and he didn’t last long as Secretary of the Treasury. We need more men like him in government, I’d say.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0