This was a big mistake on the biggest stage for the biggest American sports league. I wouldn't say it ruined the game, but it was, at minimum, a distraction that the announcers mentioned many times.
Between the Super Bowl turf itself and the huge painted logos, this seemed to create safety issues for the players and it certainly affected the quality of play. This article floats a few educated guesses about what caused the problem.
Super Bowl 57 grass: Why Chiefs, Eagles players were slipping on ‘hybrid' turf field, forced cleat change
“The NFL chose a heck of a time to try experimenting with new grass.”
As I write about in my upcoming book “The Mistakes That Make Us,” mistakes will inevitably happen when we innovate or otherwise try new things.
That said, the way to mitigate the risk is to intentionally use SMALL tests of change to prevent big, embarrassing problems. Did the NFL do enough of that?
“The league has had two weeks of preparations to make sure everything plays out on the field at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Ariz., as it should be without any potential issues.”
How much did they actually practice on the field? They probably wanted to limit that, as to protect the grass surface. Did they have high-school teams play simulated games on that exact turf?
Not to jump to solutions, but I wonder if the NFL will mandate that future Super Bowls be played on modern artificial turf?
Was this “the greatest show on turf” or a slippery, dangerous mess that could have been avoided?
What does your organization to use small tests of change to try to prevent big mistakes?
What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn. Don't want to miss a post or podcast? Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.