Lean Is Not "Frugal." Lean Is "Value."


By Dan Markovitz

BusinessWeek online joined the rest of the media in noting that Toyota just passed GM as the global leader in auto sales this quarter. The article covers all the usual points, and to its credit, does add a few words about lean. But the author goes off-track when he states that,

Toyota workers value frugality—whether it's turning down the heat at company-owned dormitories during working hours back in Japan, or spending weeks jawboning with suppliers to figure out ways to redesign a key component and shave another 10% from production costs.

Clearly, the author is trying to address the issue of muda. But he misses the point: Toyota (and the employees) aren't trying to be “frugal.” They're not trying to save money.

Rather, they're trying to eliminate the waste in their operations — from the production line to the dorm rooms — that the customer doesn't value. Hell, if Toyota really wanted to save money, they wouldn't have company dormitories at all. They'd let employees take care of their own housing.

From this perspective, “frugality” isn't the goal at all. Frugality is simply a by-product of the focus on customer value.

Please check out my main blog page at www.leanblog.org

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author's copyright.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment or share your thoughts and the post on social media. Don't want to miss a post or podcast? Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.


Get New Posts Sent To You

Select list(s):
  1. Mark Graban says

    Thanks for posting that, Dan.

    I guess I don’t see the semantic difference between frugality and cutting costs. I don’t see what’s wrong with cutting costs as long as you do it in a way that doesn’t hurt the business.

    Traditional cost cutting, such as layoffs, can hurt the business (and customers) in many ways. Traditional “supplier development” means beating up the supplier with arbitrary price reductions, which hurts the supplier and ultimately your business.

    I think it’s worth pointing out that Toyota’s “jawboning” is a collaborative effort to find savings together, “spending weeks” to actually improve the process, not just cut costs. That’s much more constructive than traditional “cost cutting”.

    I do like how the article dug into “why” Toyota is doing better, not just reporting the fact that they are.

  2. […] afford to leave the lights on, much less stockpile inventory. (Even now, of course, the company still makes a habit of turning off the lights. Waste is waste, even if you’re rich.) Financial constraints forced […]

  3. […] Markovitz beat me to the punch, but I also wanted to comment on some things in the […]

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.