Some Honesty in Pricing for Once
U.S. airlines raise fares by up to $10 each way
Here is some rare honesty in the discussion about how prices are set. Normally, an article or company would claim that “due to cost increases” (due to oil, etc.) that the company is “forced” to raise prices for their customers. Bull. Companies raise prices because they can, such as in the case of airlines with strong demand. Companies charge what the market will bear.
This is a central tenet of TPS, that Price is set by the market, so therefore Profit = Price – Cost. You only have direct control over costs, so reducing costs is the path to increased profits (yes, you can increase demand through good product design or marketing, which would increase the price the market will bear).
If your costs go up, you're not entitled to raise prices to keep profit the same. That's the old thinking of Price (set by you) = Cost + Desired Profit.
With this latest terror threat, if airline demand is down, they'll have to lower costs. That's how markets work. You charge that you can. Toyota's not the cheapest car out there… because people are willing to pay it, the market values the cars that way.
Some other Lean Blog posts on this same topic can be found here.
What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn.
Don't want to miss a post or podcast? Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.
- Join Our Upcoming Webinar on Building a Culture of Continuous Improvement through Organizational Habits - March 22, 2023
- From Fear to Improvement: Results of Our Poll on Companies' Responses to Mistakes - March 16, 2023
- Discovering the Benefits of Data-Driven DEI: An Interview with Dr. Randal Pinkett on his New Book - March 14, 2023
Ever since I saw TPS and the “Profit = Price – Cost” I have had that on my whiteboard staring me in the face everyday.
But I look at a modified version of “Profit = (Market price * Perceived Value) – cost.”
See, the market is willing to pay X amount for a car. Now, if the nameplate is GM, they’ll discount the price. If the nameplate is Toyota, they are willing to pay more.
We have the same thing here at my company — typically when we get to pricing discusions, sales is always saying “Our competition is 10% lower than us” to which we reply “Yes, on price. But when you look at what it will cost the client to use them, we are actually the cheaper solution.”
And people are willing to pay more for a lower cost solution than a lower priced solution.