GM & Delphi to Lose 40k Brains


Buyouts may top 40,000 – 06/24/06 – The Detroit News Online

Wall Street will celebrate, but GM and Delphi are about to lose the experience and problem solving ability of 40,000 people. Well, wait a minute, was GM getting the most of out of those brains anyway? Or, had employeeschecked their brains at the door at management's request? Hopefully, they can pick their brains up on their way to retirement or their next jobs.

It's amazing to me that Toyota considers employees to be a great strength and something to develop, for the good of the company and the employee, while GM sees employees as a cost. How sad. What waste.

Please check out my main blog page at

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author's copyright.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment or share your thoughts and the post on social media. Don't want to miss a post or podcast? Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.


Get New Posts Sent To You

Select list(s):
  1. Jamie Flinchbaugh says

    You make a very important point. Not all brains are equal, and sometimes its the combination of person and company that just needs a change. How many people that spent 20-30 years in the GM / Delphi system are still highly engaged change agents moving the company forward? Probably only a handful. Although the disengagement is a product of the company and environment, if you want to move forward, sometimes you have to make a break?

    Of course, these companies also just plain old have too many people. To survive, they need less. Demand is x and they have 1.4x people (or whatever the right ratio of waste is).

  2. Mark Graban says

    True, GM has to get capacity down to sales (it’s easier than increasing sales, unfortunately). I guess my point is that it’s a shame that it got to this point and that others can make sure that their employees aren’t wasted resources. Had GM gotten better use out of people’s brains, they might not be in this mess today. But, instead, arrogant GM management (at all levels) had the answers and expected employees to “just do it” (no thinking!). The Frederick Taylor model is losing to the Toyota model.

  3. Jamie Flinchbaugh says

    So here is the real question – forget GM and Delphi, what can we (collectively) do with 40,000 people who are well trained and fed up with the status quo?

    There is no question that many of these folks have both trained and learned skills, even if they aren’t helping their current employer. Wilber Ross wants to collect the pieces of the supply community and build a multi-billion dollar Tier 1. He might use some of them.

    So who wants to form a new company?

  4. Anonymous says

    I’d take the subset with good skills but then would also want the sub-set of those who haven’t been “ruined” by the GM system. Look at what happened with NUMMI…. Toyota had to be pretty selective, but they found good employees who could proper in the TPS system. I would do like Southwest Airlines does (or did) and “hire for attitude”, assuming you train people on the rest.

  5. Anonymous says

    The number is 35k according to today’s WSJ.

    “The buyouts pose a challenge because some plants may be left short-handed. GM said it will use temporary employees as necessary.”

    Great, do you want a car built by temporary workers?

  6. Anonymous says

    Almost every car is built by some temporary workers, even at Toyota

  7. Anonymous says

    But do you trust GM to have good standard work, standard processes, and training as compared to Toyota?

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.