Lean Factory Design Part 1


I did some of my long-ago masters thesis work on factory design (you can read a rather dated article on the topic here). I've had the opportunity to design factory layouts ranging from a $1B investment down to a company with $4M in revenues. Factories were designed a long time ago to take advantage both of gravity, and the fact that you have to run belts off a main drive shaft, and so you used multiple floors and had material generally work their ways down to the bottom. Once factories could be run on electricity, new factory designs didn't change to accommodate the changes in production processes for almost 40 years. Now that lean has been affecting production processes for a couple decades, how far has factory layout/design come? In my experience, not very. I just worked on another factory layout this week, and thought it was a good opportunity to share some of the common mistakes and problems with factory layout that people aren't considering in their approach. Instead of writing another thesis, I will post a few comments throughout the week in smaller bite-sized chunks.

1. Learning
We design factories as if that we the best we could, and will, do. If we know of future business, or are growing, we might put in some room for some known factors. But we don't design in a generic sense that tomorrow's business will be different than today, and our factory must change. It will change because of changes in the business. It will change because of continuous improvement. It will change because of technology improvements. It will change. Don't try to have the best design that will only be the best for one day. Try to have the best design that is flexible to adapt and change with your journey.

2. Human / People Infrastructure
We leave to brute force the fact that people must manage this factory. How many factory designs incorporate team meeting areas near their work areas? Or allow a supervisor to have line-of-sight with all of the people they support? Or plan for management and engineers and other resources to be within close distance to where they are needed? We leave this as an afterthought, versus a primary criteria of design. A good example of this is maintenance. In far too many places, maintenance is a corner off away from where their customers are. Why not have satellite maintenance areas close to each production area, with the needed parts, tools and depending on your overall resources, people?

Please check out my main blog page at www.leanblog.org

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author's copyright.

What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn – and follow me or connect with me there.

Did you like this post? Make sure you don't miss a post or podcast — Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.

Check out my latest book, The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation:

Get New Posts Sent To You

Select list(s):
Previous articleHandoffs = Errors
Next articleThe Future of Auto Suppliers
Jamie Flinchbaugh
Jamie Flinchbaugh is an accomplished Entrepreneur, Senior Executive, and Board Member with more than 20 years of success spanning finance, manufacturing, automotive, and management consulting. Leveraging extensive operational experience, Jamie is an invaluable asset for a company seeking expert guidance with process improvements, lean strategies, and leadership coaching in order to transform operations, reduce costs, and drive profitability. His areas of expertise include continuous improvement, entrepreneurship, coaching and training, process transformation, business strategy, and organizational design.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.