Fixing GM


    Yesterday The Detroit Free Press published a collection of comments from auto industry analysts and GM leaders in a piece titled “5 Ways to Fix GM

    We've put a lot on the blog in recent months about the woes of Detroit based automakers. This is really nothing new, but there are a few key facts that really stand out in defining the severity of GM's current position.

    1) The sale of GMAC, GM's financial services unit would give GM up to $12 billion in cash. No mention is made of how much revenue would be lost.

    2) A strike at Delphi would cost GM $5 billion in cash each month workers are not on the job

    3) GM is currently running through $24 million in cash daily

    I really like the quote from Van Conway, a partner with corporate turnaround firm Conway, MacKenzie & Dunleavy headquartered in Birmingham Michigan. Conway is quoted at the conclusion of the article as saying, “They (GM) have to look at doing business differently than they did in the past. You can't bully everybody everyday”.

    Put in lean terms, Mr. Conway's comments might read exactly as Management Principle 11 as listed in Liker's “The Toyota Way”:

    Respect your extended network of partners and suppliers by challenging them and helping them to improve.

    I certainly agree there are tough solutions that need to be found and executed to resolve the top priority issues and immediate threats to GM's survival. However, it's going to take much more to be successful going forward to bring products to the market with a balanced value equation that meets customer needs and expectations.

    One lesson here can be taken from Jamie Flinchbaugh & Andy Carlino's recent book, “The Hitchhiker's Guide to Lean.” I'm only about half way through but one concept that I've picked up on and have really been thinking about is the idea that managing issues or problems on ‘Top Ten' lists will not help you to improve beyond solving the immediate problems at hand. The real opportunity (and challenge) is in learning how to engage the organization to use and develop processes that enable many more small problems to be recognized and effectively resolved BEFORE they ever have the chance to evolve and grow in complexity and severity.

    Please check out my main blog page at

    The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

    , , , on the author's copyright.

    What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn – and follow me or connect with me there.

    Did you like this post? Make sure you don't miss a post or podcast — Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.

    Check out my latest book, The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation:

    Get New Posts Sent To You

    Select list(s):
    Previous articleSiren Song: Another Ad That Bugs Me
    Next articleRe-Discovering W. Edwards Deming
    Luke Van Dongen
    Luke, an auto industry engineering veteran, blogged here from 2005 to 2006.


    1. Engaging the organization to effectively solve small problems, to constantly improve, and to learn is the purpose of Quick & Easy Kaizen. It’s a key point that Detroit’s automakers don’t get.

    2. Engaging people in problem solving will work IF there is a clear VISION to things only ONCE wrong;-)

      Solving the pop-uped problem (only the symptoms) immediately just doesn’t go that far and is for some people to show that they have done something (whether it is like a burning hay fire or lasting for the future;-(().


    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.