Surveying Some KaiNexus Customers on Psychological Safety in Their Workplaces


Today, I gave a talk at the annual KaiNexicon (KaiNexus User Conference) on the theme of:

PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY: A Pre-Condition for Continuous Improvement

In advance of the conference, we invited customers who are attending to fill out a survey to gain some feedback and thoughts about how they view Psychological Safety in their workplaces.

I'm sharing those responses and thoughts here in this post. This is not a scientific survey, where we have selection bias among those who chose to vote and respond. Our KaiNexus customers are pretty self-selecting in terms of their organizations having a commitment to continuous improvement. It's not representative of the broader corporate culture as a whole.

On a scale of 1 to 10, you can see the average responses and the distribution curves for the following:

Our leaders talk specifically about psychological safety? There's an average score of 4.8 (out of 10) and it's a pretty tight distribution around 5.

Our organization has a clear definition and understanding of psychological safety? That was a 4.2 out of 10 with a lot of 5's and more 1's that bring down the average.

Our leaders know what behaviors help build psychological safety? A 4.5 out of 10, but that distribution had many more 1's and 2's and some higher scores. So there's more variation there.

When we feel enough psychological safety to speak up, our level safety might vary a bit depending on the situation. In other words, some of these “vulnerable acts” are more vulnerable than others.

Feeling safe to share concerns? 6.8 average with a lot of 8's and 10's

Feeling safe to ask questions? 6.6 with a slightly more spread out distribution.

Feeling safety to speak up about mistakes? That's not surprisingly, to me, the lowest average score, at 5.8. There's also more of a bi-modal distribution, where some people are in organizations where speaking up about mistakes is very risky, and thankfully some others feel safer doing so.

Feeling safe to share improvement ideas? That's the highest, at 8.3, which we'd hope if not expect to see in organizations that value continuous improvement more than the average workplace.

It's admittedly difficult to compare your workplace to others, especially if you've only worked in one organization.

The responses to “Our organization has a higher level of psychological safety than our competitors” and “Our organization would like help to improve the level of psychological safety” are both pretty centered around roughly 5.

Free-form Responses

The remaining questions prompted respondents for free-form answers. I'll present them as submitted so you can read the comments and the variation. Feel free to leave a comment on this post.

What's a primary barrier to higher levels of psychological safety in your organization?

We are still shifting culture out of the “business results” focus.
Business organizations can often be very political at the leadership level so fear results in expressing mistakes. Change is minimal when expressed.
Getting employees to feel comfortable speaking their concerns
Leadership is not involved with cutting-edge thinking.
The organization needs a larger understanding of roles and services provided. Too much of our work occurs in silos which leads to turf protection.
Awareness and learning to let go from old behaviors
Everyone's in survival mode; senior leaders do not recognize yet how their own behaviors may need to change; traditional culture of non-transparency at highest levels
Organization size likely results in variation in a given employee's experience with psychological safety.  Overarching culture of psychological safety likely helps set a minimum experience, though.
Psychological Safety as a formal concept is not discussed and may not be widely understood.
Pressure to deliver every second of the day, followed by a focus on the output not what it took to get it or per say the quality of it.
Mostly understanding  what it is, and then taking the time for self reflection to understand if you are providing that as a leader.
Identifying who “owns” it to make it happen
Leadership treating all front line employees as being valuable human capital worthy of explaining their purpose in the organization.

What resources do you use to educate people about psychological safety?

Internal education and HR resources
None at this time.
Webinars and educational requirements.
We don't have a deliberate plan. My team has included some basic expectations in the LSW standard and we are building a simple check in the employee survey we are designing to measure Lean Maturity.
Orientation, class time, bi-annual administration of Culture of Safety survey, RCA's, discussion in some meetings
C.I. training for leaders and front line that reinforce ideal behaviors.  General leadership training sessions primarily for new leaders.
Limited training and online materials.  Mainly relies on competent managers to talk about it, encouraging safe spaces and coaching others/demonstrating leading behaviours
We have none
NEO, annual education,
Communication meetings, motivational advertisement on tv monitors, CI program, Safety tool box talks

What actions do your leaders take in attempts to build higher levels of psychological safety?

Promoting positive open communication.
Telling direct reports it is ok to “not know” and that mistakes are learning opportunities and only bad when willingly repeated.
Not aware.
Immediate RCAs with feedback and being present to empathize with staff.
There is an honest interest to “embrace the red” and buy-in to stop making the issues about the people instead of the process
New COO centering topics of safety and transparency in their messaging; varying levels of encouragement to speak up and use KN
Expectations, forums, and mechanics to call out opportunities to improve or remedy mistakes.  Recognition and reward systems for those who do.  Target goals for improvement results achieved.
Team charters within projects and teams. Verbal setting of standards. Actively demonstrate the behaviours and create the environment directly.
No intentionality on leaderships part
This is mainly done through employee communication meetings and Gemba walks.

How would you articulate the benefits of psychological safety?

Creating positive space to express mistakes/changes needed  help create improved processes for the organization.
Feeling secure in that you are allowed to grow and make mistakes and improve yourself over time.
Empowered workforce and work environment.
The more that staff are able to report and identify potential issues, the better product we can provide and the more satisfied our staff will be.
Without it, we will never get honest feedback. Without feedback we can't improve.
A precondition for a culture of continuous improvement; humans feel valued at work;
Enables employees to focus and improve on the value they can deliver to the organization and the value the organization can deliver to its customers; which returns fulfillment back to that employee.
Employee wellbeing leading to increased motivation leading to increased productivity and improvement mindset.  Additional benefit of increased retention of staff.
The freedom to share concerns and ideas without condemnation of any sort.
Improved outcomes/safety and speed and effectiveness at responding to issues.
An employee that experiences psychological safety is one that will feel free to engage in improvement and innovation.

Any Other Comments?

The other comment was spot on!

“My opinion is that psychological safety, or other examples of a positive culture, aren't achieved through training but through repeated experiences that reinforce the belief that the safety exists.”

That statement is more of a fact than an opinion. You can train your way to psychological safety. Leaders cannot just tell people that they should feel safe. Don't rely on what Timothy R. Clark calls “rhetorical assurances.” They don't work.

When a person believes (or feels or perceives) that they have a high-degree of psychological safety, it's the result of their interactions with leaders and colleagues. What leaders SAY is important but their ACTIONS are more important.

What does work is action… when leaders “model vulnerable acts” (leading by example) and then “reward vulnerable acts” (rewarding people who follow their lead on things like admitting mistakes). Are leaders doing this consistently over time, even when under a lot of pressure?

I'm excited to speak the the group and to have a lot of conversations about psychological safety and continuous improvement over the next few days (and beyond!).

What do you think? Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Or please share the post with your thoughts on LinkedIn – and follow me or connect with me there.

Did you like this post? Make sure you don't miss a post or podcast — Subscribe to get notified about posts via email daily or weekly.

Check out my latest book, The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation:

Get New Posts Sent To You

Select list(s):
Previous articleRyan McCormack’s Operational Excellence Mixtape: May 19th, 2023
Next articleAn Update on My New Book — Print Edition Page Layout in Progress (Pre-Order Kindle Now)
Mark Graban
Mark Graban is an internationally-recognized consultant, author, and professional speaker, and podcaster with experience in healthcare, manufacturing, and startups. Mark's new book is The Mistakes That Make Us: Cultivating a Culture of Learning and Innovation. He is also the author of Measures of Success: React Less, Lead Better, Improve More, the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, and the anthology Practicing Lean. Mark is also a Senior Advisor to the technology company KaiNexus.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.