USATODAY.com – Ford will use fewer suppliers in attempt to cut costs:
The Gemba Pantarei blog also has some good comments on this story about Ford supposedly planning on moving to a more Toyota like supplier relations model of cooperation and longer term contracts.
I question the notion that Ford's push means “kinder and gentler.” My understanding was that Toyota was tough and demanding, albeit loyal and fair. A friend at a supplier once said that being a Toyota supplier can be the “best thing and worst thing to happen to you.” What are your experiences? (click comments)
I say Ford is “supposedly” moving to the Toyota model, forgive my cynicism. I saw Thomas Stallkamp speak a few years back, after Daimler bought out Chrysler and he was nearly in tears describing how Daimler was undoing all of the progress he had made in moving Chrysler toward the supplier cooperation model, that Daimler had them back to demanding year over year reductions in the old style.
I remember a few years back in the PC industry, where Compaq would announce a new “build to order” strategy every year to compete with Dell, only to move away from it when it suited them (or they just failed outright). Will the same happen with Ford and GM?
Please scroll down (or click) to post a comment. Connect with me on LinkedIn.
Let’s work together to build a culture of continuous improvement and psychological safety. If you're a leader looking to create lasting change—not just projects—I help organizations:
- Engage people at all levels in sustainable improvement
- Shift from fear of mistakes to learning from them
- Apply Lean thinking in practical, people-centered ways
Interested in coaching or a keynote talk? Let’s start a conversation.
You cannot expect to achieve success by adopting an individual component of an interdependent system of management.
The evidence that Ford understands what is required, is missing, in my opinion.
See more on this topic in Ford and Managing the Supplier Relationship