Say No to "Quick Changeover"…

You might be surprised to see that phrase. Say “no” to quick changeover?? That’s a core method in the Toyota Production System, right? Well, a method called “SMED” or “Single Minute Exchange of Dies” is. Why the distinction in terminology?

I recently was contacted by John Henry, who has the website. He says this:

At, we don’t believe in “quick” changeover. Too often, this simply means trying to do the same thing quicker by making associates work harder and faster. This doesn’t lead to any lasting gains and may cause more problems than it solves.

We believe in lean changeover.

Lean changeover is changeover from which all wasted effort, motion, tasks and, most importantly, time, have been removed.

Great point, SMED isn’t about rushing through your work or doing it the “same way, but faster.”

Henry advocates what he calls “ESEE”:

We believe that changeover should be ESEE:

Eliminate all non-value added tasks

Simplify all tasks that cannot be eliminated

Externalize changeover as much as possible

Exactly! Make all changeover settings precise and repeatable

There is a presentation (PDF format) that talks about SMED and racing pit crews, take a look.

Henry also pointed out that the old Henry Ford book, “My Life and Work” is available for free download on the internet. Nice free resource there.

Subscribe via RSS | Lean Blog Main Page | Podcast | Twitter @MarkGraban

Please check out my main blog page at

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author’s copyright.

Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please scroll down to post a comment. Click here to be notified about posts via email. Learn more about Mark Graban’s speaking, writing, and consulting.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Mark Graban's passion is creating a better, safer, more cost effective healthcare system for patients and better workplaces for all. Mark is a consultant, author, and speaker in the "Lean healthcare" methodology. He is author of the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, as well as The Executive Guide to Healthcare Kaizen. His most recent project is an book titled Practicing Lean that benefits the Louise H. Batz Patient Safety Foundation, where Mark is a board member. Mark is also the VP of Improvement & Innovation Services for the technology company KaiNexus.

Posted in: Blog
Tags: ,

2 Comments on "Say No to "Quick Changeover"…"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Jon Miller says:

    It’s a good presentation with nice photos and explanation of basic quick changeover principles. I wonder how many of us would agree that “quick” implies “rushed” or working harder, instead of something that is done in a short amount of time and effort. “That was quick” is generally a positive statement.

    I would argue that “lean” is more misunderstood, and implies in the minds of many that people are asked to do more with less resources (as opposed to by wasting less resource).

    By the same argument would “small lot size production” be bad, while “lean lot size production” good, since “small” implies an unreasonable reduction in lot sizes, while lean is based on cutting out waste? Likewise “quick delivery” is bad, but “lean delivery” is good?

    ESEE (easy?) changeover sure sounds better than SMED. But keep quick changeover.

    The Henry Ford book download is a GREAT find. Thanks for sharing that.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Also on Google books, somewhat simpler to access:


Post a Comment