Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful"

by Mark Graban on May 2, 2008 · 0 comments

 Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" leanWhy do you need a “be careful” warning message when you’ve already error proofed something? For liability’s sake?

I am going to be flying back and forth to the UK a lot this summer, so I needed an airplane power adapter/converter. The one I ordered had this packaging insert, pictured to the left (click on any picture for a larger view)
Why is the warning even needed? The product is designed with two types of error proofing in mind. First, there are colored lines that help visually indicate the correct orientation of the plug insert. Not the most effective error proofing, but it’s something.
 Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
The second form of error proofing is much more effective — the plug and port are asymmetrical. It seems pretty impossible to insert it the wrong way, even if you forced it. That’s the smarter way of designing things — make it truly impossible to do something the wrong way. So is the “IMPORTANT” reminder unnecessary? Seems like it.

 Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" leanThis reminded me of a similar situation I saw in a hospital laboratory. They had two pieces of testing instrumentation, both from the same vendor. The one instrument (ironically, the newer one) had no error proofing. It was possible to load a rack of test tubes (pictured left) backward, which would have jammed up the instrument.

 Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" leanSo, there was a warning sign, exhorting the technologists to be careful. How effective was this? Somebody managed to load it backward about once a week, they told me. You see, even if people are trained and they are “careful”, human error is exactly that — we make mistakes because we are human. Error proofing would have been a better approach

 Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" leanThe loading chute for the older instrument (again, this manufacturer had taken a step BACKWARD in the new generation) was error proofed brilliantly. See the angled corner in the lower left side of the slot? It’s shaped perfectly so the rack cannot be loaded backward. Just like my DC power adapter. No need for a warning or a caution or a “Be Careful!” It’s not as “pretty” as the new instrument, but it’s more effective. More “elegant,” you might say.

I see far too many “Be Careful” signs in hospitals. I have quite a collection of photos of them. Maybe I can share them in some format, maybe a monograph on not exhorting people to “be careful”??

Subscribe via RSS Lean Blog Main Page Podcast Message Board

pbp Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean

Mark Graban 2011 Smaller Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" leanAbout LeanBlog.org: Mark Graban is a consultant, author, and speaker in the “lean healthcare” methodology, focused on improving quality and patient safety, improving access, reducing costs, and fully engaging healthcare professionals. He is also the Chief Improvement Officer for KaiNexus.


pixel Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
Share, Print, or Be Social:
  • printfriendly Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
  • twitter Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
  • facebook Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
  • googlebookmark Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
  • linkedin Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
  • digg Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
  • stumbleupon Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
  • delicious Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean
  • posterous Error Proofing Vs. "Be Careful" lean

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

Previous post:

Next post: