<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Lean Enterprise Institute Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leanblog.org/2008/04/new-lei-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leanblog.org/2008/04/new-lei-survey/</link>
	<description>Mark Graban&#039;s leanblog.org - Lean Healthcare, Lean Thinking, Lean Manufacturing, Toyota Production System</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:40:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Yip</title>
		<link>http://www.leanblog.org/2008/04/new-lei-survey/#comment-3483</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Yip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leanblog.bigbigdesign.net/2008/04/new-lean-enterprise-institute-survey/#comment-3483</guid>
		<description>Having just been learning about Appreciative Inquiry, I wonder if it&#039;s also useful (or perhaps more useful) to do a root cause analysis of the successful aspects of a Lean implementation.  I would expect that even in the most difficult implementations, there was success somewhere.  I would also expect that analysing these positive deviants will lead to the same understanding of what works and what doesn&#039;t.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The difference is that we can ground changes in a solution that has already been shown to be successful.  I&#039;d suggest that it&#039;s less likely that approaching the situation from the other side will encourage blame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just been learning about Appreciative Inquiry, I wonder if it&#8217;s also useful (or perhaps more useful) to do a root cause analysis of the successful aspects of a Lean implementation.  I would expect that even in the most difficult implementations, there was success somewhere.  I would also expect that analysing these positive deviants will lead to the same understanding of what works and what doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The difference is that we can ground changes in a solution that has already been shown to be successful.  I&#8217;d suggest that it&#8217;s less likely that approaching the situation from the other side will encourage blame.</p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-3483" src="http://www.leanblog.org/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3483', 'add', 'www.leanblog.org/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="" /> <span id="karma-3483-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-3483" src="http://www.leanblog.org/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3483', 'subtract', 'www.leanblog.org/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="" /> <span id="karma-3483-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

