By February 23, 2008 4 Comments Read More →

Respect for People: US Army Edition

strategy+business, the e-magazine from Booz, Allen & Hamilton, reports how the US Army is changing the way that it shares knowledge within such a massive organization. The new system is a powerful example of how respect for people and a focus on correcting systems can lead to huge improvements.

The Army’s bureaucracy has been criticized over the years for impeding the transfer of essential knowledge quickly throughout the organization. To address that problem, the Army developed the Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) network in 2006. This Web-based collaboration system allows new bottom-up concepts to be disseminated instantly to those who can benefit from them. In its first year of operation, the network shared more than 15,000 lessons from combat operations. Of these, more than 4,000 led directly to improvements in unit preparation and training for deployment.

The article explains how the deeply-rooted Army culture inhibited the adoption of CALL at first:

“As you might imagine, some Army leaders were initially reluctant to allow CALL analysts to post information about their own snafus because they didn’t want such failures broadcast and didn’t want to be penalized for errors. But analysts worked around these ingrained anxieties by assuming that if team X is having a particular difficulty, it likely reflects a systemic problem. The analysts will check around the network to see if others are experiencing a similar challenge. And when they get confirmation, they post the problem on CALL in a generic fashion, specifically describing the issues, mistakes, and lessons learned without identifying who, what, when, or where.”

And this is where we come to respect for people: the focus of CALL is not on identifying a person’s mistakes or penalizing individuals for having problems. Rather, the assumption is that there’s a “systemic problem” that needs to be addressed and fixed. In other words, there’s no blame for doing something wrong.

Toyota, of course, approaches mistakes and defects on the production line in the same way. They’re opportunities to learn, to solve problems, and to improve the system — not excuses to fire or punish someone.

Please check out my main blog page at www.leanblog.org

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author’s copyright.


Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please scroll down to post a comment. Click here to receive posts via email.


Now Available – The updated, expanded, and revised 3rd Edition of Mark Graban’s Shingo Research Award-Winning Book Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Engagement. You can buy the book today, including signed copies from the author.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Please consider leaving a comment or sharing this post via social media.

Dan Markovitz

Dan Markovitz is president of Markovitz Consulting, a firm that radically improves operational speed and efficiency by applying lean concepts to knowledge work. He is a faculty member at the Lean Enterprise Institute and teaches at the Stanford University Continuing Studies Program. He also lectures on A3 thinking at the Ohio State University’s Fisher School of Business. Dan is a frequent speaker and presenter at conferences, and has consulted to organizations as diverse as Camelbak, Clif Bar, Abbott Vascular, WL Gore & Associates, Intel, the City of Menlo Park, and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. His book, A Factory of One, was honored with a Shingo Research Award in 2013. Dan has also published articles in the Harvard Business Review blog, Quality Progress, Industry Week magazine, Reliable Plant magazine, and Management Services Journal, among other magazines. All of these articles are available for download on the Resources page. Earlier in his career, he held management positions in product marketing at Sierra Designs, Adidas, CNET and Asics Tiger, where he worked in sales, product marketing, and product development. He also has experience as an entrepreneur, having founded his own skateboarding footwear company. Dan lived in Japan for four years and is fluent in Japanese. He holds a BA from Wesleyan University and an MBA from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business.

4 Comments on "Respect for People: US Army Edition"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Lester says:

    Well, as I read this a few times it is not exactly that they don’t still blame people. If you have an issue, you cannot really pull the cord….. You have to wait until a couple of people pull the cord and then they may post your issue, which is not exactly the same as pulling the cord and respect for people. Though I admit it is a start.

  2. Mark Graban
    Twitter:
    says:

    Hospitals could use an exact same system and attitude adjustment.

    This could be used to share information across units in a hospital, across hospitals in a system, or across hospitals regardless of affiliation (in the name of safety and quality).

    Great stuff.

  3. J Thatcher says:

    I guess this means I can’t be an “Army of One” anymore.
    I’ll have to settle for “Army strong!”

    That’s mostly a joke, but it is fairly interesting to note this tiny step in the right direction occurring alongside a shift in how the army presents itself in its marketing efforts – perhaps it reflects an overarching change.

    The section, not quoted, about using essentially socially generated knowledge to determine deployed troop policy slightly scares me.
    There’s a reason wikipedia is free and you have to pay for JSTOR, I’m not certain I want tactics and policy for the largest killing machine ever created in human history being run like a giant myspace blog. Expert knowledge has its place.

  4. Mike L says:

    Sounds like the Army has found a really cool way to harness the knowledge and experience of their people. Learning from mistakes is just such a central part of Lean thinking.

    As I travel to my company’s various manufacturing locations, I am constantly exposed to a wide range of ideas for improvement. I’d like to share these ideas with the rest of our organization, but we don’t have a good information-sharing system for this yet. So far, we’ve experimented with blogs, message boards, and e-newsletters with varying degrees of success.

    Any suggestions?

Post a Comment