Nissan’s Mock Assembly Lines

Mock Assembly Lines Work Out Glitches: Financial News – Yahoo! Finance

Nissan has struggled with quality (particularly in their Mississippi plant), so they are taking some dramatic steps to improve their handoff and collaboration between design and production with a global “mockup line” to test their designs and processes. Rather than relying solely on digital design, they plan on testing processes in the physical world:

Testing production in advance on mock assembly lines may help fine-tune production and improve product quality, says Shozo Takata, science and engineering professor at Waseda University.

“It could serve the purpose of separating problems at the design stage from problems at the production stage,” he said in a telephone interview. “That tends to be meaningful.”

Nissan has acknowledged that quality has sometimes suffered in recent years abroad, including its new U.S. plant in Canton, Mississippi. But Sakai and other Nissan officials are determined to catch potential glitches early in the game.

The lean/Toyota model often teaches us to spend more time and expense in the planning stages, so we can implement/execute more quickly. Having designs worked out in advance instead of having the factory react, adjust, and be heroes can be good for productivity and quality.

Please check out my main blog page at www.leanblog.org

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author’s copyright.


Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please scroll down to post a comment. Click here to receive posts via email.


Now Available – The updated, expanded, and revised 3rd Edition of Mark Graban’s Shingo Research Award-Winning Book Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Engagement. You can buy the book today, including signed copies from the author.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Please consider leaving a comment or sharing this post via social media.

Mark Graban's passion is creating a better, safer, more cost effective healthcare system for patients and better workplaces for all. Mark is a consultant, author, and speaker in the "Lean healthcare" methodology. He is author of the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, as well as The Executive Guide to Healthcare Kaizen. His most recent project is an eBook titled Practicing Lean that benefits the Louise H. Batz Patient Safety Foundation, where Mark is a board member. Mark is also the VP of Improvement & Innovation Services for the technology company KaiNexus.

Posted in: Uncategorized
Tags: ,

1 Comment on "Nissan’s Mock Assembly Lines"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Karthik Chandramouli says:

    When I read this article, it had me scratching my head in disbelief. The implication is that Nissan was NOT doing this in the past.

    Can someone from Nissan clarify if this is the case?

    I know that Toyota has been building mock assembly lines for years. Particularly for “overseas” projects, during the pre-production phase, the “Mother” Plant in Japan will work closely with equipment and tooling suppliers to build an assembly line for high-volume part trials. Also, they do this to validate the equipment that will be installed overseas.

    Then they tear down the line and ship it to the factory where it will be installed.

    From first glance, it appears that Nissan is experiencing the human limits of growth. Toyota ran into this problem and, in 2003, established a Global Production Center to standardize production preparation activities globally, particularly as it relates to development of people.

    I know everyone loves to generalize about the Japanese automotive OEMs, but they are definitely unique, and have very different philosophies — beyond the high-level common approach that is the foundation for the Toyota, Honda, and Nissan production systems.

    If you look at The Toyota Way, The Honda Way, and The Nissan Production Way, each has a very distinct approach, which leads to significantly different approaches.

    This is a good example of how the Japanese OEMs are not identical in the way that they apply commonly-held principles.

Post a Comment

CommentLuv badge