Lean and Economic Development

JS Online: Editorial: A new way of thinking:

Wisconsin is mentioned frequently here on the Lean Blog, with many small and mid-sized companies, in particular, getting great benefits from Lean (such as this case). Now, the Milwaukee newspaper is promoting Lean as part of the state’s economic strategy. I’m just happy

“The state Legislature should boost funding for the Wisconsin Manufacturing Extension Partnership, which provides technical know-how for small and midsize companies. Lawmakers should fund the ‘Get Lean’ initiative, which will award grants to help companies adopt lean manufacturing principles. They should continue supporting engineering programs.”

I’m not big on the government micromanaging the economy, but I’d have to think that government support for Lean really would be a good investment, dollar for dollar. I’d maybe set up the grants so that there are certain guidelines, including not using lean productivity improvements to drive layoffs. It would probably be tough to set up real objective measures to see if they’re doing lean “the right way” or if that lean investment would just be a waste.

Update: Kevin Meyer also blogged about this today

Please check out my main blog page at www.leanblog.org

The RSS feed content you are reading is copyrighted by the author, Mark Graban.

, , , on the author’s copyright.


Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please scroll down to post a comment. Click here to receive posts via email.


Now Available – The updated, expanded, and revised 3rd Edition of Mark Graban’s Shingo Research Award-Winning Book Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Engagement. You can buy the book today, including signed copies from the author.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Please consider leaving a comment or sharing this post via social media.

Mark Graban's passion is creating a better, safer, more cost effective healthcare system for patients and better workplaces for all. Mark is a consultant, author, and speaker in the "Lean healthcare" methodology. He is author of the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, as well as The Executive Guide to Healthcare Kaizen. His most recent project is an eBook titled Practicing Lean that benefits the Louise H. Batz Patient Safety Foundation, where Mark is a board member. Mark is also the VP of Improvement & Innovation Services for the technology company KaiNexus.

Posted in: Blog
Tags:

7 Comments on "Lean and Economic Development"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    NO! This is a very bad idea. As said in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Lean – If you define something as a “Finish Line”, people usually will do whatever they can to cross it. Companies are drawn to metrics, like these government goals – and improvements made in the name of LEAN (on paper) might actually be LAME (in reality). This directly contradicts the PROFIT = PRICE – COST idea of Lean accounting, by not letting the market sort out inefficiencies (because waste in production = higher cost, and higher cost = lower demand, etc.)

  2. Mark Graban says:

    Bad idea to have government sponsorship because it will be done in a results-oriented way?

    What I was suggesting was a more process-focused “are you doing Lean properly?” bar, but that’s hard to measure. And who would give the stamp of LEAN vs LAME approval?

  3. Anonymous says:

    Who SHOULD give the stamp of LEAN vs. LAME approval? The market – unwilling to pay for a company’s inefficiencies. Lean improvements should not be subsidized – they are their own reward…

  4. Mike T says:

    Sounds like a great theory, “lean improvements…are their own reward.” The problem is, many small to medium companies cannot afford to bring in a resource to show them the way. In my position, I work with other Lean leaders in my surrounding community. Many of these leaders are using the tools of lean, thinking they are “leaning” because it is all they know. Lean is far more than the tools. The TOTAL is far greater than the sum of the PARTS.

  5. Anonymous says:

    In theory this sounds good – let’s help business succeed. However, it’s in government’s hands. Is that really the best, lean, waste-free way? MEPs in reality range from a handful of very competent people to outright crooks. Many focus on the limits of 5S and a few kaizen events, because that’s all they know. As a company with operations everywhere, we will take into any free or subsidized support we can get. However, if someone let me vote on it, I would not put tax dollars (from the same companies) to work trying to “help” companies.

  6. Romain Real says:

    I’m working in Haute Savoie (France) and the logic of my researches are nearly the same as Wisconsin’s : helping the small and medium shops of my territory to become Lean in the right way.
    This initiative is great and I’d like to know more about it.

    Thank you for your huge work Mark (and all the team).

  7. Mike T says:

    Wisconsin MEPS is *probably* one of the best MEPS programs in the US. We have plants in Wisconsin, South Dakota, Missouri, Illinois, Mexico, India and China. I’ve worked with MEPS from 3 of the states. Some are exactly as you describe – 5S and Kaizen = Lean. However, some truly are trying to teach Lean concepts.

    As a Lean leader who has spent time training under past Toyota leaders, I am always willing to go to another company and share what I have learned (and often do)…no, there are no consulting fees. I haven’t the knowledge to go there. But its a way to share the message and true understanding of the system…no different than Mark’s blog.

    You can find information on the MEPS programs by searching for Manufacturing Extension Partnerships.

Post a Comment