Will Lean Outperform Bureaucracy?

Worldandnation: Scandal sires bureaucracy

It’s too bad that the Lean Six Sigma component of the response to the problems at Walter Reed has been lumped into the category of “bureaucracy.”

There are no less than nine blue-ribbon committees, task forces and review groups investigating soldiers’ medical care, some of them with overlapping missions.

“Every time I turn around there is a new committee,” said William Bradshaw, national veterans service director for the Veterans of Foreign Wars. “That’s just overkill. Everyone is piling on.”

I can understand that all of the task forces, committees, and “blue ribbon” panels might be just political posturing or blaming exercises. But, Lean efforts should really be doing something to fix the problems, right?

The article says:

Lastly, there’s a “Lean Six Sigma” review. Tiger Teams and 15-6 investigations are military jargon for internal investigations. Lean Six Sigma is a performance review used in the business world to improve speed and quality of service.

Done right, Lean should be more than just a review of the problems. It really should be focused on kaizen and improvement. I would bet that whatever improvements are driven by Lean and Six Sigma might well be claimed as success by any of the politically-driven investigations, eh?

Please check out my main blog page at www.leanblog.org


Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please scroll down to post a comment. Click here to be notified about posts via email. Learn more about Mark Graban’s speaking, writing, and consulting.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Mark Graban's passion is creating a better, safer, more cost effective healthcare system for patients and better workplaces for all. Mark is a consultant, author, and speaker in the "Lean healthcare" methodology. He is author of the Shingo Award-winning books Lean Hospitals and Healthcare Kaizen, as well as The Executive Guide to Healthcare Kaizen. His most recent project is an book titled Practicing Lean that benefits the Louise H. Batz Patient Safety Foundation, where Mark is a board member. Mark is also the VP of Improvement & Innovation Services for the technology company KaiNexus.

Posted in: Blog
Tags: , ,

1 Comment on "Will Lean Outperform Bureaucracy?"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. jp says:

    Seems like another half-armed journalist mislabeling Lean/LSS. She later calls it “another form of Army investigation”, which is odd to me.

    Mislabeling aside, the main point is interesting. I’ve also noticed an orientation for government types toward “studies” vs. improvement of processes. Project teams I work with often list project goals like “we will analyze the xxxx process and determine key factors to improve performance.” Close, but no cigar! The goal needs to focus on improvement of outcomes in terms of cost/speed/quality.

    Mark’s prediction on credit for success is pretty true as well. I suppose that’s a consequence of making Lean/LSS into a program rather than an ingrained way of life. Does anyobdy know how to take an organization and turn it 90 degrees without a program?

Post a Comment