World Class Numbers?

by Mark Graban on March 28, 2007 · 2 comments

Blog reader Darrin wrote and asked:

Do you have any up-to-date sources for “word-class” numbers for lean metrics like % of Leadtime that is wasted, % yields, etc.?

I know I’ve seen numbers for benchmark “% value added time”, etc. but don’t have the numbers ready, nor am I sure if the numbers are current. A google search turned up nothing but firms willing to do benchmarking studies.

Does anyone have any ready references (from lean books, articles, journals, etc.)?

Thanks for compensating for my laziness!

I’ve never fixated on the benchmark numbers, since I’ve always tried to set the bar against perfection, or as close as we can get. I know nobody fully eliminates non-value added time completely, but you can get it pretty low. In each of my lean endeavors, we always try to estimate where we can get based on our particular process and our analysis of the current state and expected improvements.

Mark Graban 2011 Smaller World Class Numbers? leanAbout LeanBlog.org: Mark Graban is a consultant, author, and speaker in the “lean healthcare” methodology, focused on improving quality and patient safety, improving access, reducing costs, and fully engaging healthcare professionals. He is also the Chief Improvement Officer for KaiNexus.


pixel World Class Numbers? lean
Share, Print, or Be Social:
  • printfriendly World Class Numbers? lean
  • twitter World Class Numbers? lean
  • facebook World Class Numbers? lean
  • googlebookmark World Class Numbers? lean
  • linkedin World Class Numbers? lean
  • digg World Class Numbers? lean
  • stumbleupon World Class Numbers? lean
  • delicious World Class Numbers? lean
  • posterous World Class Numbers? lean

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1 jp March 29, 2007 at 8:46 pm

Darrin and others,
My consulting firm (George Group) has collected benchmark #s from over 100 companies for Process Cycle Efficiency. We define PCE as Customer Value Add time / Process Cycle Time. We consider the following levels best-in-class for various operations.

Machining 20%
Fabrication 25%
Batch Assembly 35%
1piece Assembly 80%
Transactional 50%
Creative/Cognitive 25%

You can imagine that most real-life operations fall far short of these marks. We also offer some initial PCE goals for those just starting on their lean journey.

Machining 1%
Fabrication 10%
Batch Assembly 15%
1piece Assembly 30%
Transactional 10%
Creative/Cognitive 5%

Combining different types of operations typically takes you toward the lowest set of numbers, but I am basing that on personal instinct vs. real data. Last exhaustive VSA I did was comprised of mostly continuous processes (PCE ~80%), but when you looked across the 8 major operations, total PCE was only 5%!

Hope this helps. Would love to hear some more numbers…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Reply

2 Anonymous April 3, 2007 at 10:41 am

Thank you, JP. THose are some very interesting numbers- and have given me some food for thought.

When I was going through my lean expert certification at a multi-national corporation, they taught us that the 4 states a product can be in at any given time are:

1) Transport
2) Inspection
3) Processing
4) Storage

…with 1, 2, and 4 all classified as waste (from a purist standpoint).

I am now wondering if there are any benchmark figures for those categories. For example, a world-class organization has less than 5% of “Storage” time as expressed as a part of overall lead-time.

I’d like to present to our leadership a comparison of our performance to those of world class lean orgs.

Thanks!
-Darrin

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

Previous post:

Next post: